Young children's naive theory of biology
- PMID: 8039360
- DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90027-2
Young children's naive theory of biology
Abstract
This article aimed at investigating the nature of young children's naive theory of biology by reviewing a large number of studies conducted in our laboratories. More specifically, we tried to answer the following five critical questions. What components does young children's knowledge system for biological phenomena (or naive biology) have? What functions does it have in children's lives? How is it acquired in ontogenesis? How does its early version change as children grow older? Is it universal across cultures and through history? We propose that young children's biological knowledge system has at least three components, that is, knowledge needed to specify the target objects of biology, ways of inferring attributes or behaviors of biological kinds, and a non-intentional causal explanatory framework, and that these three constitute a form of biology, which is adaptive in children's lives. We also claim that the core of naive biology is acquired based on specific cognitive constraints as well as the general mechanism of personification and the resultant vitalistic causality, but it is differently instantiated and elaborated through activity-based experiences in the surrounding culture.
Similar articles
-
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007. PMID: 17394580
-
Vitalistic causality in young children's naive biology.Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Aug;8(8):356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.004. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004. PMID: 15335462 Review.
-
Cross-cultural investigations.Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1996;61(1-2):131-55. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1996. PMID: 8657166
-
Young children's understanding of the mind-body distinction.Child Dev. 1993 Oct;64(5):1534-49. Child Dev. 1993. PMID: 8222887
-
The essentialist aspect of naive theories.Cognition. 2000 Feb 14;74(2):149-75. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00071-2. Cognition. 2000. PMID: 10617780 Review.
Cited by
-
Generic Language Use Reveals Domain Differences in Children's Expectations about Animal and Artifact Categories.Cogn Dev. 2013 Jan;28(1):63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.09.002. Cogn Dev. 2013. PMID: 23335836 Free PMC article.
-
Food Concepts Among Black and Hispanic Preschool-Age Children: A Preliminary Qualitative Descriptive Study Using Ethnographic Techniques and an Internet Conferencing Platform.Nutrients. 2025 Apr 10;17(8):1313. doi: 10.3390/nu17081313. Nutrients. 2025. PMID: 40284178 Free PMC article.
-
Spontaneous Anthropocentric Language Use in University Students' Explanations of Biological Concepts Varies by Topic and Predicts Misconception Agreement.CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Mar 1;24(1):ar11. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-07-0198. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025. PMID: 39808720 Free PMC article.
-
"It kinda has like a mind": Children's and parents' beliefs concerning viral disease transmission for COVID-19 and the common cold.Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105413. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105413. Epub 2023 Feb 21. Cognition. 2023. PMID: 36842249 Free PMC article.
-
The Substance of Cold: Indonesians' Use of Cold Weather Theory to Explain Everyday Illnesses.Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 16;12:734044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734044. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34603156 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources