Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 1994 Feb;8(2):153-60.

Male circumcision: a role in HIV prevention?

I de Vincenzi, T Mertens
  • PMID: 8043224
Editorial

Male circumcision: a role in HIV prevention?

I de Vincenzi et al. AIDS. 1994 Feb.

Abstract

PIP: Speculation has existed for decades on the association between the lack of male circumcision and the sexual transmission of disease. It has been suggested that the surface epithelium of the glans develops a protective keratin layer following circumcision which functions like a natural condom against contracting disease. Circumcised males may therefore be less susceptible to contracting sexually transmitted diseases (STD), including HIV. The identification of simian immunodeficiency virus-infected mononuclear cells in the dermis and epidermis of the penile foreskin of macaques also suggests that male circumcision may reduce the infectivity of men with HIV. The authors review the evidence in support of the association between the lack of circumcision and STDs, and the possible biological explanations. They also discuss the implications for public health interventions and suggest areas and methods for further research. Twenty-three published study reports linking circumcision status to HIV infection are identified and include retrospective studies including partner studies, cross-sectional serosurveys, a longitudinal study, and ecological correlations. Five studies linked the lack of circumcision to STDs other than HIV infection. In interpreting the data, the authors consider susceptibility versus infectivity, assessment of behaviors and adjustment for confounding, selection bias, misclassification of exposure, measure of association, and publication bias. It is ultimately concluded that more studies are needed to quantify the relative risk associated with the lack of male circumcision. Observational designs could be employed to that end along with laboratory and primate research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources