Barber-pole illusions and plaids: the influence of aperture shape on motion perception
- PMID: 8047406
- DOI: 10.1068/p221155
Barber-pole illusions and plaids: the influence of aperture shape on motion perception
Abstract
The barber-pole illusion and its influence on plaid perception were investigated in two experiments to test the following expectations: (i) apertures which bias the perception of grating motion in directions consistent with plaid direction will facilitate plaid perception, and (ii) apertures which bias the perception of grating motion in directions inconsistent with plaid direction will disrupt plaid perception. In experiment 1 the barber-pole illusion was measured as a function of grating orientation (20 degrees, 45 degrees, and 70 degrees, clockwise and counterclockwise from horizontal), and aperture shape (vertical, horizontal; at each of three elongations). Barber-pole illusions reported with 45 degrees gratings increased with increased aperture elongation. However, this was not found with 20 degrees and 70 degrees gratings; these were almost always reported as moving in a direction parallel to the side of the aperture with which the gratings formed angles approaching 90 degrees. In experiment 2 this dependence of barber-pole illusions on the relative orientation between gratings and apertures was also evident with 45 degrees gratings in oblique apertures; only oblique directions of grating motion were reported. The influence of the same apertures on the separate contrast thresholds required for initial plaid coherence and initial plaid decomposition was measured. In experiments 1 and 2, coherence thresholds were unaffected by apertures, contrary to expectation (i). However, in both experiments expectation (ii) was confirmed; decomposition thresholds decreased in apertures which biased perceived direction of gratings towards vertical (plaid direction), and increased in apertures which biased grating motion away from vertical. Adaptation of plaid mechanisms during measurement of decomposition thresholds was proposed to explain the discrepancy between coherence and decomposition data. Taken together, the results were interpreted as reflecting interactions between mechanisms mediating the barber-pole illusion and mechanisms mediating plaid perception.
Similar articles
-
The directional tuning of the barber-pole illusion.Perception. 2001;30(11):1321-36. doi: 10.1068/p3156. Perception. 2001. PMID: 11768487
-
Integration of one- and two-dimensional motion signals in infants: evidence from the barber-pole illusion.Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(20):3360-72. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.05.017. Epub 2006 Jul 18. Vision Res. 2006. PMID: 16854447
-
The influence of aperture surfaces on the barber-pole illusion.Perception. 1997;26(2):141-52. doi: 10.1068/p260141. Perception. 1997. PMID: 9274750
-
The role of early mechanisms in motion transparency and coherence.Spat Vis. 1993;7(2):125-47. doi: 10.1163/156856893x00324. Spat Vis. 1993. PMID: 8347549 Review.
-
The Most Influential Scientists in the Development of Medical Informatics (26): Barry Barber (1933-2019).Acta Inform Med. 2020 Jun;28(2):144-145. doi: 10.5455/aim.2020.28.144-145. Acta Inform Med. 2020. PMID: 32742068 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Action and attentional load can influence aperture effects on motion perception.Exp Brain Res. 2011 Mar;209(2):215-24. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2537-y. Epub 2011 Jan 26. Exp Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21267553
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources