[Controlled study of treatment of residual depression by clomipramine versus placebo]

Abstract

The choice of a new treatment strategy for a patient suffering from residual depression in sometimes difficult; in reality, any change in the prescription involves a risk of losing any benefit, even partial, that has recently been obtained; consequently, can one be sure that a new antidepressant treatment will be beneficial? To attempt to find the answer to this question, the Laboratories Ciba-Geigy have conducted a controlled study versus placebo to evaluate the efficacy of clomipramine in residual depression which has been progressing for more than a year. 207 patients were pre-included in the 7-day wash-out phase and treated with placebo. During this period, a clinical examination and laboratory work-up made it possible to exclude patients with a curable cause of partial resistance to antidepressants (e.g., hypothyroidism) or who were "placebo-responders". After this run-in, 181 patients were included if they complied with the criteria characterizing a major depressive episode in partial remission (according to the DSM III-R), present for at least one year and treated throughout this period with at least two antidepressants at effective dosages. In addition, these patients had to have a score between 15 and 25 on the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The patients included were randomized into two groups, receiving either an clomipramine 75 tablet or a placebo tablet for two weeks; the dosage could be increased to two tablets as at D14 if necessary and maintained for the next six weeks. The only authorized concomitant treatments were tranquillizers (lorazepam or bromazepam) and/or non-barbiturate hypnotics (zopiclone or flunitrazepam).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)