Effects of a limiting Medicaid drug-reimbursement benefits on the use of psychotropic agents and acute mental health services by patients with schizophrenia
- PMID: 8052275
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199409083311006
Effects of a limiting Medicaid drug-reimbursement benefits on the use of psychotropic agents and acute mental health services by patients with schizophrenia
Abstract
Background: We examined the effects of a three-prescription monthly payment limit (cap) on the use of psychotropic drugs and acute mental health care by noninstitutionalized patients with schizophrenia. We hypothesized that reducing access to such drugs would increase the use of emergency mental health services and the rate of partial hospitalizations (full-day or half-day treatment programs) and psychiatric-hospital admissions.
Methods: We linked Medicaid claims data for a period of 42 months with clinical records from two community mental health centers (CMHCs) and the single state psychiatric hospital in New Hampshire, where Medicaid imposed a three-prescription limit on reimbursement for drugs during 11 months (months 15 through 25) of the study. For comparison, we used Medicaid claims for a period of 42 months in New Jersey, which had no limit on drug reimbursement. The study patients (n = 268) and the comparison patients (n = 1959) were permanently disabled, noninstitutionalized patients with schizophrenia, 19 through 60 years of age, who were insured by Medicaid. We conducted interrupted time-series regression analyses to estimate the effects of the cap on the use of medications and mental health services.
Results: The cap resulted in immediate reductions (range, 15 to 49 percent) in the use of antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants and lithium, and anxiolytic and hypnotic drugs (P < 0.01). It also resulted in coincident increases of one to two visits per patient per month in visits to CMHCs (range of increase, 43 to 57 percent; P < 0.001) and sharp increases in the use of emergency mental health services and partial hospitalization (1.2 to 1.4 episodes per patient per month), but no change in the frequency of hospital admissions. After the cap was discontinued, the use of medications and most mental health services reverted to base-line levels (measured in the first 14 months of the study). The estimated average increase in mental health care costs per patient during the cap ($1,530) exceeded the savings in drug costs to Medicaid by a factor of 17.
Conclusions: Limits on coverage for the costs of prescription drugs can increase the use of acute mental health services among low-income patients with chronic mental illnesses and increase costs to the government, even aside from the increases caused in pain and suffering on the part of patients.
Similar articles
-
Effects of Medicaid drug-payment limits on admission to hospitals and nursing homes.N Engl J Med. 1991 Oct 10;325(15):1072-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199110103251505. N Engl J Med. 1991. PMID: 1891009
-
Changes in drug coverage generosity and untreated serious mental illness: transitioning from Medicaid to Medicare Part D.JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;72(2):179-88. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1259. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 25588123 Free PMC article.
-
Unintended outcomes of medicaid drug cost-containment policies on the chronically mentally ill.J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64 Suppl 17:19-22. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003. PMID: 14680423
-
Geographic variations in use of Medicaid mental health services.Psychiatr Serv. 2015 May 1;66(5):452-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400337. Epub 2015 Mar 1. Psychiatr Serv. 2015. PMID: 25726983 Review.
-
Mental health policy and psychotropic drugs.Milbank Q. 2005;83(2):271-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00347.x. Milbank Q. 2005. PMID: 15960772 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Point-counterpoint: the importance of "open access" to psychotropics for our patients.Psychiatr Q. 2006 Winter;77(4):329-34. doi: 10.1007/s11126-006-9018-7. Psychiatr Q. 2006. PMID: 16927162
-
Can increases in CHIP copayments reduce program expenditures on prescription drugs?Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 May 20;4(2):mmrr2014.004.02.a03. doi: 10.5600/mmrr2014-004-02-a03. eCollection 2014. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014. PMID: 24967148 Free PMC article.
-
The financial burden of out-of-pocket expenses in the United States and Canada: How different is the United States?SAGE Open Med. 2016 Jan 25;4:2050312115623792. doi: 10.1177/2050312115623792. eCollection 2016. SAGE Open Med. 2016. PMID: 26985389 Free PMC article.
-
Why some disabled adults in Medicaid face large out-of-pocket expenses.Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Aug;29(8):1517-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0147. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010. PMID: 20679656 Free PMC article.
-
Financial and family burden associated with cancer treatment in Ontario, Canada.Support Care Cancer. 2006 Nov;14(11):1077-85. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0088-8. Epub 2006 May 30. Support Care Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16896878
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous