Safety and durability of redo carotid endarterectomy for recurrent carotid artery stenosis
- PMID: 8053521
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(94)80062-6
Safety and durability of redo carotid endarterectomy for recurrent carotid artery stenosis
Abstract
We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent redo carotid endarterectomies during a 5-year period. Patients were followed by duplex ultrasound to assess late patency of the carotid artery. Reoperations for recurrent carotid stenosis were performed in 46 of 973 patients who had carotid endarterectomies (5%). Indications for surgery were hemispheric transient ischemic attacks (TIA) in 33 (72%) and asymptomatic greater than 80% stenosis in 13 (28%). Pathologic findings revealed that the cause of recurrence was myointimal hyperplasia in 11 patients (24%), with a mean recurrence interval of 12.8 postoperative months, and atherosclerosis in 35 (76%), with a mean recurrence interval of 84 postoperative months (P = 0.0002). Redo endarterectomy with patch angioplasty was used for reconstruction in 32 cases (70%), patch angioplasty alone in 11 (24%), and endarterectomy with primary closure in 3. There were 3 perioperative strokes (7%). Late follow-up (mean 30.9 months) revealed no strokes and 1 TIA. Of 40 patients, 34 (85%) were alive and stroke free. Although six late deaths occurred, none were stroke related. One patient (2%) had late significant second recurrent carotid stenosis. Redo carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic patients and asymptomatic high-grade stenosis is safe and durable.
Similar articles
-
Redo carotid surgery: An analysis of materials and configurations used in carotid reoperations and their influence on perioperative stroke and subsequent recurrent stenosis.J Vasc Surg. 1999 Jan;29(1):72-80; discussion 80-1. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70350-2. J Vasc Surg. 1999. PMID: 9882791
-
Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing reoperation for recurrent carotid artery disease.J Vasc Surg. 1993 Dec;18(6):991-8; discussion 999-1001. J Vasc Surg. 1993. PMID: 8264056
-
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1. J Vasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24794275
-
Carotid endarterectomy for unstable and compelling neurologic conditions: do results justify an aggressive approach?J Vasc Surg. 1994 Jan;19(1):32-40; discussion 40-2. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70118-0. J Vasc Surg. 1994. PMID: 8301736 Review.
-
Clinical application of eversion carotid endarterectomy.Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2003 Jul-Aug;37(4):239-44. doi: 10.1177/153857440303700402. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2003. PMID: 12894365 Review.
Cited by
-
Sites of recurrence and long-term results of redo surgery.Ann Surg. 1997 May;225(5):512-5; discussion 516-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199705000-00008. Ann Surg. 1997. PMID: 9193179 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of recurrent cerebrovascular disease. Review of a 10-year experience.Ann Surg. 1995 May;221(5):517-21; discussion 521-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199505000-00009. Ann Surg. 1995. PMID: 7748033 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of Restenosis following Carotid Endarterectomy Using Contrast-Enhanced Vessel Wall MR Imaging.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Mar;43(3):422-428. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7423. Epub 2022 Feb 17. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022. PMID: 35177544 Free PMC article.
-
Risks Associated With Primary and Redo Carotid Endarterectomy in the Endovascular Era.JAMA Surg. 2018 Mar 1;153(3):252-259. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4477. JAMA Surg. 2018. PMID: 29117272 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical