Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994;68(4):315-21.
doi: 10.1007/BF00571450.

Changes in intra-abdominal pressure, trunk muscle activation and force during isokinetic lifting and lowering

Affiliations

Changes in intra-abdominal pressure, trunk muscle activation and force during isokinetic lifting and lowering

A G Cresswell et al. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1994.

Abstract

Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), force and electromyographic (EMG) activity from the abdominal (intra-muscular) and trunk extensor (surface) muscles were measured in seven male subjects during maximal and sub-maximal sagittal lifting and lowering with straight arms and legs. An isokinetic dynamometer was used to provide five constant velocities (0.12-0.96 m.s-1) of lifting (pulling against the resistance of the motor) and lowering (resisting the downward pull of the motor). For the maximal efforts, position-specific lowering force was greater than lifting force at each respective velocity. In contrast, corresponding IAPs during lowering were less than those during lifting. Highest mean force occurred during slow lowering (1547 N at 0.24 m.s-1) while highest IAP occurred during the fastest lifts (17.8 kPa at 0.48-0.96 m.s-1). Among the abdominal muscles, the highest level of activity and the best correlation to variations in IAP (r = 0.970 over velocities) was demonstrated by the transversus abdominis muscle. At each velocity the EMG activity of the primary trunk and hip extensors was less during lowering (eccentric muscle action) than lifting (concentric muscle action) despite higher levels of force (r between -0.896 and -0.851). Sub-maximal efforts resulted in IAP increasing linearly with increasing lifting or lowering force (r = 0.918 and 0.882, respectively). However, at any given force IAP was less during lowering than lifting. This difference was negated if force and IAP were expressed relative to their respective lifting and lowering maxima.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1983;15(4):183-96 - PubMed
    1. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1990 May;5(2):59-67 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57(5):526-30 - PubMed
    1. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980 Mar-Apr;20(2):159-54 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1985;17(1):25-38 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources