Insertion mutagenesis as a tool to predict the secondary structure of a muscarinic receptor domain determining specificity of G-protein coupling
- PMID: 8058746
- PMCID: PMC44528
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.7980
Insertion mutagenesis as a tool to predict the secondary structure of a muscarinic receptor domain determining specificity of G-protein coupling
Abstract
The N-terminal segment of the third intracellular loop (i3) of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and other G protein-coupled receptors has been shown to largely determine the G-protein coupling selectivity displayed by a given receptor subtype. Based on secondary-structure prediction algorithms, we have tested the hypothesis that this region adopts an alpha-helical secondary structure. Using the rat m3 muscarinic receptor as a model system, a series of five mutant receptors, m3(+1A) to m3(+5A) were created in which one to five additional alanine residues were inserted between the end of the fifth transmembrane domain and the beginning of i3. We speculated that this manipulation should lead to a rotation of the N-terminal segment of the i3 domain (if it is in fact alpha-helically arranged), thus producing pronounced effects on receptor/G protein coupling. Pharmacological analysis of the various mutant receptors expressed in COS-7 cells showed that m3(+1A), m3(+3A), and m3(+4A) retained strong functional activity, whereas m3(+2A) and m3(+5A) proved to be virtually inactive. Helical wheel models show that this pattern is fully consistent with the notion that the N-terminal portion of i3 forms an amphiphilic alpha-helix and that the hydrophobic side of this helix represents the G-protein recognition surface.
Similar articles
-
Functional role of a cytoplasmic aromatic amino acid in muscarinic receptor-mediated activation of phospholipase C.J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 15;269(15):11537-41. J Biol Chem. 1994. PMID: 8157684
-
Coexpression studies with mutant muscarinic/adrenergic receptors provide evidence for intermolecular "cross-talk" between G-protein-linked receptors.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Apr 1;90(7):3103-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.7.3103. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993. PMID: 8385357 Free PMC article.
-
Functional role of proline and tryptophan residues highly conserved among G protein-coupled receptors studied by mutational analysis of the m3 muscarinic receptor.EMBO J. 1993 Jan;12(1):331-8. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05661.x. EMBO J. 1993. PMID: 7679072 Free PMC article.
-
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: structural basis of ligand binding and G protein coupling.Life Sci. 1995;56(11-12):915-22. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(95)00028-5. Life Sci. 1995. PMID: 10188793 Review.
-
Structural basis of receptor/G protein coupling selectivity studied with muscarinic receptors as model systems.Life Sci. 1997;60(13-14):1007-14. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(97)00041-6. Life Sci. 1997. PMID: 9121341 Review.
Cited by
-
Structural features of heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled receptors and their modulatory proteins.Mol Neurobiol. 1999 Apr;19(2):111-49. doi: 10.1007/BF02743657. Mol Neurobiol. 1999. PMID: 10371466 Review.
-
Structures of the M1 and M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor/G-protein complexes.Science. 2019 May 10;364(6440):552-557. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw5188. Science. 2019. PMID: 31073061 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular Architecture of G Protein-Coupled Receptors.Drug Dev Res. 1996 Jan 1;37(1):1-38. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2299(199601)37:1<1::AID-DDR1>3.0.CO;2-S. Drug Dev Res. 1996. PMID: 21921973 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources