Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Sep;192(3):637-43.
doi: 10.1148/radiology.192.3.8058927.

Radiation dosimetry for electron beam CT

Affiliations

Radiation dosimetry for electron beam CT

C H McCollough et al. Radiology. 1994 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the radiation dose profile, multiple-scan average dose (MSAD), and computed tomography dose index (CTDI) for electron beam CT and to determine the accuracy of ionization-chamber and manufacturer estimates of patient dose.

Materials and methods: High-resolution dose profiles along the longitudinal axis were acquired at several positions within the scan plane with use of radiographic film. The full-width-at-half-maximum values, peak radiation dose, CTDI, and MSAD were calculated from the digitized film profiles. CTDI was also measured with an ionization chamber.

Results: The full-width-half-maximum value of the radiation profiles were significantly wider than the nominal scan width for the 6-mm single-section and 8-mm multisection modes. In the single-section mode, the CTDI underestimated the MSAD by 15%-30%. The multisection radiation profile was nonuniform and asymmetric.

Conclusion: Patient doses in electron beam CT are approximately 125% of the ionization-chamber CTDI measurements in the single-section mode. For the multisection mode, the average patient dose over the scan volume is approximately 70%-85% of the ionization-chamber CTDI measurements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Coronary artery calcification.
    Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Doherty TM, et al. Radiology. 1995 May;195(2):576-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7598765. Radiology. 1995. PMID: 7598765 No abstract available.