Influence of callosal activity on units in the auditory cortex of ferret (Mustela putorius)
- PMID: 8064345
- DOI: 10.1152/jn.1994.71.5.1740
Influence of callosal activity on units in the auditory cortex of ferret (Mustela putorius)
Abstract
1. Callosal neurons in primary auditory cortex project heavily to regions of the contralateral homotopic field that are excited by stimulation of one or both ears and minimally to regions that are excited by stimulation of one ear and inhibited by stimulation of the other ear. The intent of this study is to begin assessing the function of this extensive intercortical projection in determining the response properties of single units in the recipient auditory cortex. 2. Callosal neurons in the right auditory cortex of barbiturate-anesthetized ferrets were stimulated electrically through a pair of monopolar microelectrodes that were separated by 2-3 mm and whose uninsulated tips were located 500 microns below the pial surface. Electrical stimuli consisted of a single 100-microseconds pulse delivered at a fixed intensity and temporal relationship to the onset of each of a set of monaural or binaural acoustic stimuli. Pulse amplitude was almost always < 350 microA. Acoustic stimuli consisted of 100-ms best-frequency tones delivered monaurally or binaurally at 1-s intervals. The influence exerted by electrical stimulation of the right auditory cortex on responses of single units isolated in the left auditory cortex was assessed by comparing responses evoked by the same acoustic stimuli delivered alone and when accompanied by the electrical stimulation. In addition, the latencies of discharges evoked by the electrical stimuli delivered alone were assessed. Three categories of influence were observed: suppression, excitation, and a mixed class consisting of both suppression and excitation. 3. Suppression was the most commonly observed influence of callosal input on acoustically evoked responses. Depending on the strength of the acoustic stimuli and electrical pulse and the temporal relationship between the two kinds of stimulation, responses to acoustic stimuli could be completely suppressed or reduced to a smaller version of the control responses. The duration of the inhibitory influence was often > 100 ms and the suppression was frequently effective at latencies of 2-4 ms. 4. Although unit activity was commonly excited by electrical stimulation of the right auditory cortex, facilitation of acoustically evoked responses was infrequently observed. Apparent facilitation usually was the result of the summation of acoustically and electrically evoked discharges.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.J Neurophysiol. 1994 Nov;72(5):2334-59. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.5.2334. J Neurophysiol. 1994. PMID: 7884463
-
Effects of ear plugging on single-unit azimuth sensitivity in cat primary auditory cortex. II. Azimuth tuning dependent upon binaural stimulation.J Neurophysiol. 1994 Jun;71(6):2194-216. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.71.6.2194. J Neurophysiol. 1994. PMID: 7931511
-
Binaural organization of primary auditory cortex in the ferret (Mustela putorius).J Neurophysiol. 1994 Mar;71(3):904-13. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.71.3.904. J Neurophysiol. 1994. PMID: 8201431
-
Hemispheric specialization and ear advantages in processing speech.Psychol Bull. 1984 Sep;96(2):273-91. Psychol Bull. 1984. PMID: 6385045 Review. No abstract available.
-
Representation of acoustic events in the primary auditory cortex.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Feb;19(1):203-16. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.1.203. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993. PMID: 8440986 Review.
Cited by
-
Anisomorphic cortical reorganization in asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.J Neurophysiol. 2017 Aug 1;118(2):932-948. doi: 10.1152/jn.00119.2017. Epub 2017 May 17. J Neurophysiol. 2017. PMID: 28515283 Free PMC article.
-
Binaural noise stimulation of auditory callosal fibers of the cat: responses to interaural time delays.Exp Brain Res. 1995;104(1):30-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00229853. Exp Brain Res. 1995. PMID: 7621939
-
Interhemispheric Callosal Projections Sharpen Frequency Tuning and Enforce Response Fidelity in Primary Auditory Cortex.eNeuro. 2020 Aug 17;7(4):ENEURO.0256-20.2020. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0256-20.2020. Print 2020 Jul/Aug. eNeuro. 2020. PMID: 32769158 Free PMC article.
-
Selective Interruption of Auditory Interhemispheric Cross Talk Impairs Discrimination Learning of Frequency-Modulated Tone Direction But Not Gap Detection and Discrimination.J Neurosci. 2022 Mar 9;42(10):2025-2038. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0216-21.2022. Epub 2022 Jan 21. J Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35064004 Free PMC article.
-
The functional characterization of callosal connections.Prog Neurobiol. 2022 Jan;208:102186. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102186. Epub 2021 Nov 12. Prog Neurobiol. 2022. PMID: 34780864 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources