Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1994 Apr;15(2):83-90.
doi: 10.1007/BF02924657.

Indications for surgery in severe acute pancreatitis

Affiliations
Review

Indications for surgery in severe acute pancreatitis

D W McFadden et al. Int J Pancreatol. 1994 Apr.

Abstract

The decision to operate on a patient with severe acute pancreatitis is often difficult and requires mature clinical judgment. Those indications that are widely accepted include: 1. For differential diagnosis, when the surgeon is concerned that the symptoms are the result of a disease other than pancreatitis for which operation is mandatory; 2. In persistent and severe biliary pancreatitis, when an obstructing gallstone that cannot be managed endoscopically is lodged at the ampulla of Vater; 3. In the presence of infected pancreatic necrosis; and 4. To drain a pancreatic abscess, if percutaneous drainage does not produce the desired result. Other indications that are less well defined and somewhat controversial are: 1. The presence of sterile pancreatic necrosis involving 50% or more of the pancreas; 2. When the pancreatitis persists in spite of maximal medical therapy; and 3. When the patient's condition deteriorates, often with the failure of one or more organ systems. For these latter three indications, guidelines have been presented that permit a logical approach to management, although uncertainty remains. Surgeons should strive to describe in precise terms the clinical state of their patients at the time that operation is performed, as well as the findings at and technical details of the surgery. This should allow further refinement in the management of this still vexing problem.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 1989 Jul 22;2(8656):201-5 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1988 Mar;75(3):207-12 - PubMed
    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984 Apr;59(4):259-67 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1986 Feb;121(2):196-208 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1992 Nov;103(5):1636-40 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources