One-stage laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical perineal prostatectomy
- PMID: 8072087
- DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32531-4
One-stage laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical perineal prostatectomy
Abstract
Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection is currently an accepted procedure for staging adenocarcinoma of the prostate. To assess the feasibility and efficacy of performing laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and radical perineal prostatectomy during the same anesthesia, we retrospectively analyzed 98 patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate who were candidates for radical prostatectomy. Of the patients 12 (12%) underwent laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection only since they had metastatic disease to the pelvic lymph nodes on frozen section evaluation (the Gleason pathological grade was 2 to 4 in 2 patients, 5 to 7 in 8 and 8 in 2). Of the remaining 86 patients who underwent radical perineal prostatectomy for definitive management 76 (88%) underwent 1-stage radical perineal prostatectomy immediately after laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, while 10 (12%) in the initial stages of our series underwent delayed perineal prostatectomy following laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection (2-stage). The average postoperative hospital stay in the 1-stage group was 3.11 days, yet 19 (25%) patients were discharged from the hospital within 48 hours and another 39 (51%) within 72 hours. Thus, 76% of the patients were discharged from the hospital within 72 hours of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and radical perineal prostatectomy. The advent of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and radical perineal prostatectomy has found a resurgence at our institutions, with its lower morbidity rate and more rapid return to normal activity for these patients. Based on our results, we recommend laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection followed by radical perineal prostatectomy as a 1-stage treatment option for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Comment in
-
Prostate cancer and quality of life.J Urol. 1994 Oct;152(4):1180. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32533-8. J Urol. 1994. PMID: 8072089 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Combined laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and modified belt radical perineal prostatectomy for localized prostatic adenocarcinoma.Urology. 1994 Apr;43(4):493-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(94)90238-0. Urology. 1994. PMID: 8154070
-
The value of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in conjunction with radical perineal or retropubic prostatectomy.J Urol. 1994 Jun;151(6):1599-602. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35312-0. J Urol. 1994. PMID: 8189572 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical perineal prostatectomy: a viable alternative to radical retropubic prostatectomy.J Urol. 1994 Apr;151(4):905-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35119-4. J Urol. 1994. PMID: 8126823
-
Laparoscopic staging pelvic lymphadenectomy: extraperitoneal approach.Semin Surg Oncol. 1996 Mar-Apr;12(2):134-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199603/04)12:2<134::AID-SSU8>3.0.CO;2-A. Semin Surg Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8685579 Review.
-
No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):528-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.064. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15028451 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical