Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum
- PMID: 8075199
Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the results of elective colorectal operations, to identify factors that influence the anastomotic leak rate, and to assess the value of a covering colostomy.
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: University hospital.
Subject: 134 consecutive patients undergoing elective resection for a neoplasm (125 carcinomas and 10 villous adenomas) of the colon and rectum.
Interventions: 135 operations (one for a recurrence in the anastomotic line).
Main outcome measures: Morbidity and mortality.
Results: Two patients died (1%) and there were 29 complications (21%); 16 patients developed clinical anastomotic leaks (12%) and 3 patients symptomatic strictures (2%). One patient who developed a leak died and 11 of the 16 (69%) were re-operated on. The rest settled spontaneously. The only significant risk factor associated with leakage was distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (all 16 leaks were within 7 cm, compared with 44/118 without leaks, p < 0.001). Four patients who developed leaks were left with permanent colostomies. Protecting stomas had no significant influence, despite the fact that only 1 of those that developed leaks had a colostomy compared with 9/109 that did not.
Conclusion: Prospective controlled studies are needed to establish the true value of a covering colostomy after low colorectal anastomosis.
Similar articles
-
A randomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses.Eur J Surg. 1997 Dec;163(12):929-33. Eur J Surg. 1997. PMID: 9449446 Clinical Trial.
-
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum.Colorectal Dis. 2004 Nov;6(6):462-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x. Colorectal Dis. 2004. PMID: 15521937
-
[Temporary colostomies after sigmoid colon and rectum interventions--are they still justified?].Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1997;382(3):149-56. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1997. PMID: 9324614 German.
-
Stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a prospective study.Eur J Surg. 1996 Oct;162(10):805-10. Eur J Surg. 1996. PMID: 8934111 Review.
-
[The dehiscence of colorectal anastomoses: the risk factors].Ann Ital Chir. 2000 Jul-Aug;71(4):433-40. Ann Ital Chir. 2000. PMID: 11109667 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial.Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2590-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3974-z. Epub 2014 Dec 5. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25475516 Clinical Trial.
-
Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary?Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Feb;400(2):145-52. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1275-1. Epub 2015 Jan 30. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015. PMID: 25633276 Review.
-
Ultimate fate of the leaking intestinal anastomosis: does leak mean permanent stoma?J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jun;14(6):987-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1190-2. Epub 2010 Apr 7. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010. PMID: 20373046
-
Prediction of anastomotic leakage after anterior rectal resection.Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(3):830-835. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.3.252. Pak J Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 31258603 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses.World J Surg. 2007 May;31(5):1142-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0218-y. World J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17354030 Review.