Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Sep;24(3):746-54.
doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90024-8.

T wave "humps" as a potential electrocardiographic marker of the long QT syndrome

Affiliations
Free article

T wave "humps" as a potential electrocardiographic marker of the long QT syndrome

M H Lehmann et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: This study attempted to determine the prevalence and electrocardiographic (ECG) lead distribution of T wave "humps" (T2, after an initial T wave peak, T1) among families with long QT syndrome and control subjects.

Background: T wave abnormalities have been suggested as another facet of familial long QT syndrome, in addition to prolongation of the rate-corrected QT interval (QTc), that might aid in the diagnosis of affected subjects.

Methods: The ECGs from 254 members of 13 families with long QT syndrome (each with two to four generations of affected members) and from 2,948 healthy control subjects (age > or = 16 years, QTc interval 0.39 to 0.46 s) were collected and analyzed. Tracings from families with long QT syndrome were read without knowledge of QTc interval or family member status (210 blood relatives and 44 spouses).

Results: We found that T2 was present in 53%, 27% and 5% of blood relatives with a "prolonged" (> or = 0.47 s, "borderline" (0.42 to 0.46 s) and "normal" (< or = 0.41 s) QTc interval, respectively (p < 0.0001), but in only 5% and 0% of spouses with a borderline and normal QTc interval, respectively (p = 0.06 vs. blood relatives). Among blood relatives with T2, the mean [+/- SD] maximal T1T2 interval was 0.10 +/- 0.03 s and correlated with the QTc interval (p < 0.01); a completely distinct U wave was seen in 23%. T2 was confined to leads V2 and V3 in 10%, whereas V4, V5, V6 or a limb lead was involved in 90% of blood relatives with T2. Among blood relatives with a borderline QTc interval, 50% of those with versus 20% of those without major symptoms manifested T2 in at least one left precordial or limb lead (p = 0.05). A T2 amplitude > 1 mm (grade III) was observed, respectively, in 19%, 6% and 0% of blood relatives with a prolonged, borderline and normal QTc interval with T2 in at least one left precordial or limb lead. Among the 2,948 control subjects, 0.6% exhibited T2 confined to leads V2 and V3, and 0.9% had T2 involving one or more left precordial lead (but none of the limb leads). Among 37 asymptomatic adult blood relatives with QTc intervals 0.42 to 0.46 s, T2 was found in left precordial or limb leads in 9 (24%; 5 with limb lead involvement) versus only 1.9% of control subjects with a borderline QTc interval (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that in families with long QT syndrome, T wave humps involving left precordial or (especially) limb leads, even among asymptomatic blood relatives with a borderline QTc interval, suggest the presence of the long QT syndrome trait.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources