Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 1994 Jul;5(4):299-309.
doi: 10.1007/BF01804980.

Residential proximity to electricity transmission and distribution equipment and risk of childhood leukemia, childhood lymphoma, and childhood nervous system tumors: systematic review, evaluation, and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Residential proximity to electricity transmission and distribution equipment and risk of childhood leukemia, childhood lymphoma, and childhood nervous system tumors: systematic review, evaluation, and meta-analysis

E P Washburn et al. Cancer Causes Control. 1994 Jul.

Erratum in

  • Cancer Causes Control 1994 Sep;5(5):487

Abstract

In 1979, Wertheimer and Leeper reported an increased risk of cancer mortality among children living near 'electrical wiring configurations' suggestive of high current flow. Since then, numerous, often inconclusively small, investigations with conflicting results have studied the possible association between exposure to electric and magnetic fields (EMF) and health effects. The high prevalence of exposure to EMF has drawn attention to the issue of carcinogenesis. We report here the results of a meta-analysis of 13 epidemiologic studies of residential proximity to electricity transmission and distribution equipment and risk of childhood leukemia, lymphoma, and nervous system tumors. The combined relative risks for leukemia, lymphoma, and nervous system tumors are 1.49 (95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-2.00); 1.58 (CI = 0.91-2.76); and 1.89 (CI = 1.34-2.67) respectively. The reports of the primary studies were evaluated for epidemiologic quality and adequacy of exposure assessment. We found no statistically significant relation between combined relative risk estimates and 15 indicators of epidemiologic quality. Assessment of EMF exposure in the primary studies was found to be imperfect and imprecise. Additional high quality epidemiologic research, incorporating comprehensive assessments of EMF exposure collected concurrently with surrogate measures of exposure, is needed to confirm these results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Cancer. 1989 Nov;60(5):793-8 - PubMed
    1. Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1993 Apr 28;Doc No 50:[4967 words; 53 paragraphs] - PubMed
    1. Cancer Causes Control. 1990 Jul;1(1):59-68 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Oct 1;138(7):467-81 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1993 Sep 25;307(6907):774 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources