A mathematical model of intraluminal and intracavitary brachytherapy
- PMID: 8087488
- DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-800-805
A mathematical model of intraluminal and intracavitary brachytherapy
Abstract
The adaptation of the linear-quadratic model to allow for the effect of tumour regression and clonogen repopulation between initial teletherapy and subsequent brachytherapy has been extended to include the geometrical conditions encountered in intraluminal and intracavitary brachytherapy. For a radiation line source placed at the centre of a lumen or cavity, regression of any endoluminal tumour towards its mural origin will not result in any change in the minimum brachytherapy-tumour dose with time. In contrast, regression of transmural tumour will cause a potentially advantageous increase in the minimum brachytherapy-tumour dose with time. The latter effect will be opposed by tumour clonogen repopulation. The log(e) cell kill due to brachytherapy has been calculated for tumours of diameters 2, 4 and 6 cm at completion of teletherapy. The centres of the tumours were assumed to be at distances of 0, 1 and 2 cm from the radiation source. Tumour linear regression rates (lambda) ranging from 0.025 to 0.25 per week and tumour clonogen doubling times (Tp) of 2.5, 5 and 15 days were used in the calculations. The results demonstrate the critical importance of the distance of the tumour centre from the line source as well as the influence of tumour diameter, lambda and Tp. In some instances, both maximum and minimum values of log(e) cell kill occur. Calculations of tumour cure probabilities reveal that these variations in log(e) cell kill predicted by the model can produce highly significant differences in tumour control rates. Where the relevant parameters can be assessed directly or estimated from previous experience, the model provides a basis for the design of future intraluminal or intracavitary brachytherapy protocols.
Similar articles
-
Effect of overall time when radiotherapy includes teletherapy and brachytherapy: a mathematical model.Br J Radiol. 1994 Jan;67(793):63-70. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-793-63. Br J Radiol. 1994. PMID: 8298877
-
Derivation of the optimum dose per fraction from the linear quadratic model.Br J Radiol. 1995 Aug;68(812):894-902. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-812-894. Br J Radiol. 1995. PMID: 7551788
-
The reduction of tumour control with increasing overall time: mathematical considerations.Br J Radiol. 1996 Sep;69(825):830-8. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-825-830. Br J Radiol. 1996. PMID: 8983587
-
Radiobiology of brachytherapy: The historical view based on linear quadratic model and perspectives for optimization.Cancer Radiother. 2018 Jun;22(4):312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.11.011. Epub 2018 May 30. Cancer Radiother. 2018. PMID: 29858137 Review.
-
Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery.Int J Radiat Biol. 1992 Aug;62(2):249-62. doi: 10.1080/09553009214552071. Int J Radiat Biol. 1992. PMID: 1355519 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources