Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 Mar;88(3):393-6.

Sedation and analgesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8094940
Clinical Trial

Sedation and analgesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy

S Chokhavatia et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Mar.

Abstract

We compared analgesia and sedation provided by one of four different opioids in combination with midazolam during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients were given 1-3 mg midazolam and meperidine 50-100 mg, fentanyl 50-100 micrograms, sufentanil 5-10 micrograms, or alfentanil 150-300 micrograms, plus additional opioid and/or midazolam if needed. No untoward effects (i.e., O2 saturation < 85%, nausea, vomiting, severe bradycardia) occurred. Sedation and analgesia were comparable in the upper gastrointestinal groups. The number of patients with amnesia for the examination was highest in the meperidine group. Recovery time generally was shorter with alfentanil and sufentanil. Recovery time of the lower gastrointestinal patients was significantly longer in the meperidine group than in the other groups; analgesia scores for sufentanil were significantly lower than for meperidine. Sedation scores for these patients were highest in the meperidine group. The number of patients given meperidine who were amnesic was significantly greater than for the other opioids. Meperidine was better than the other opioids with regard to patient comfort and amnesia during colonoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer