Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993;86(3):184-8.

[Prevention of thromboembolism in hip fracture: unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin ( a prospective, randomized study)]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 8130009
Clinical Trial

[Prevention of thromboembolism in hip fracture: unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin ( a prospective, randomized study)]

[Article in German]
A Platz et al. Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed. 1993.

Abstract

In a prospective, randomized study in patients with hip fracture we discuss whether a single dose of low-molecular-heparin (Sandoparin) has the same effect as a tripple dose of standard-heparin (Liquemin: 3 x 5000 I.E.) The first dose of low-molecular-heparin respectively standard-heparin is given in the emergency room before the operation. Between 4th and 6th day following operation the patients were screened for deep vein thrombosis: Clinical examination, Liquid Crystal Contact Thermography (LCCT), colour coded ultrasound examination and with phlebography. 33 patients have been treated with standard-heparin and 35 with low-molecular-heparin. In the group of standard-heparin 30% of all the patients showed a deep vein thrombosis, whereas only 17% deep vein thrombosis were found in the group treated with low-molecular-heparin. But to reach statistical significance in both groups 60 patients are needed. Postoperative haemorrhagic complications were seen in 6.1% in the group of standard-heparin and in 8% in the group of low-molecular-heparin. The LCCT and the ultrasound examination were compared with the phlebography. The LCCT had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 85%. The ultrasound examination had a sensitivity of only 15%! Therefore the ultrasound examination is an unsuitable screening method to detect deep vein thrombosis in patients with fractures of the proximal end of the femur.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources