Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 May;10(4):271-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF01204941.

A preliminary trial of human zygote culture in Ham's F-10 without hypoxanthine

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A preliminary trial of human zygote culture in Ham's F-10 without hypoxanthine

D C Loutradis et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993 May.

Abstract

Purpose: This study deals with the suitability of Ham's F-10 without hypoxanthine for early cleavage-stage embryo culture. A high percentage of mouse two-cell embryos developed into morula and blastocysts in Ham's F-10 formulated without hypoxanthine (75.3 and 71.6%, respectively); in contrast, in agreement with previous reports, only 15.4% developed beyond the two-cell stage in Ham's F-10 with hypoxanthine. To begin to evaluate the effect of hypoxanthine on human embryos, a total of 318 human oocytes was fertilized and cultured in Ham's F-10 minus hypoxanthine.

Results: The fertilization, cleavage, and pregnancy percentages in two ovulation induction protocols [human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG)/human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin releasing hormone/hMG/hCG] were 82, 88, and 20 and 83, 91, and 30%, respectively.

Conclusion: These results suggest that, in agreement with mouse embryo development, hypoxanthine does not appear to be necessary for human embryo cleavage and its omission from Ham's F-10 may enhance the conditions for culture of early-cleaving human embryos. These observations may lead to a better understanding of critical cell processes during early human embryonic development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1970 Mar;133(3):921-5 - PubMed
    1. Biol Reprod. 1987 Sep;37(2):311-6 - PubMed
    1. Fertil Steril. 1990 Jul;54(1):90-5 - PubMed
    1. Exp Cell Res. 1963 Feb;29:515-26 - PubMed
    1. Fertil Steril. 1988 Oct;50(4):612-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources