Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Dec;2(12):1250-8.
doi: 10.1001/archfami.2.12.1250.

Presence of human papillomavirus infection of the uterine cervix as determined by different detection methods in a low-risk community-based population

Affiliations

Presence of human papillomavirus infection of the uterine cervix as determined by different detection methods in a low-risk community-based population

P Zazove et al. Arch Fam Med. 1993 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of various screening tests for detecting genital human papillomavirus (HPV) in a community-based population and to determine the prevalence of cervical lesions on colposcopically directed biopsies in patients found to have HPV by any screening test.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis of 208 female patients screened for HPV by clinical examination, Papanicolaou test, dot blot hybridization test (ViraPap, Digene Inc, Silver Spring, Md), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. All persons with abnormal or positive results by any method were offered colposcopic evaluation.

Setting: Two community-based family practice offices in southeastern Michigan.

Main outcome measures: The presence of HPV as determined by each test and results of colposcopic biopsies (gold standard) in patients who had HPV identified by any test.

Results: The prevalence of HPV infection was 20.3% by PCR analysis, 3.1% by ViraPap, 3.0% by the Papanicolaou test, and 0% by clinical examination. Symptomatic patients (those with complaints of vaginal odor, swelling, or itching) were more likely to harbor HPV as determined by PCR analysis than were asymptomatic women (P = .03, odds ratio = 2.65). Human papillomavirus type 16 or 18 was found in 41% of patients with positive PCR analyses and in all patients with positive ViraPap tests that were typed. Colposcopy with biopsy (gold standard for the presence of HPV disease) was performed on 34 of the 41 patients who tested positive for HPV by PCR analysis. Histologic results revealed that 79.4% of these patients had cervical disease: 14.6% had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, 38.3% had condyloma, and 26.5% had cervicitis.

Conclusions: Human papillomavirus as detected by PCR analysis was present in 20.3% of women in our population and was often one of the higher-risk types (16 or 18). A positive PCR analysis was predictive of cervical disease on colposcopic biopsy. The ViraPap test, Papanicolaou test, and clinical examination were insensitive measures for detecting HPV-related lesions in this population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms