Protection against rotavirus disease after natural rotavirus infection. US Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy Group
- PMID: 8133107
- DOI: 10.1093/infdis/169.4.900
Protection against rotavirus disease after natural rotavirus infection. US Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy Group
Abstract
Determination of protective efficacy after natural rotavirus infection is important as a basis for evaluating rotavirus vaccines. Therefore, placebo recipients in a large 2-year rotavirus vaccine trial conducted across the United States were followed to determine the protection afforded by natural rotavirus infection. Serotype 1 rotaviruses predominated (93% year 1, 66% year 2), but isolates of all four major human rotavirus serotypes circulated during both years. Of the 45 placebo recipients with documented rotavirus illnesses in year 1, 1 developed rotavirus disease in year 2 compared with 29 of the other 235 placebo recipients (P = .03). Serologic data were available for 171 placebo recipients, and 37 of 140 without rotavirus illnesses in year 1 had evidence of asymptomatic rotavirus infection. None of these 37 experienced rotavirus disease in year 2 compared with 22 of the remaining 103 (P < .001). Overall efficacy after natural rotavirus infection was 93% (95% confidence interval, 50%-99%).
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of rhesus rotavirus monovalent and tetravalent reassortant vaccines in US children. US Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy Group.JAMA. 1995 Apr 19;273(15):1191-6. JAMA. 1995. PMID: 7707626 Clinical Trial.
-
Rotavirus serotypes: classification and importance in epidemiology, immunity, and vaccine development.J Health Popul Nutr. 2000 Jun;18(1):5-14. J Health Popul Nutr. 2000. PMID: 11014764 Review.
-
The protective effectiveness of natural rotavirus infection in an American Indian population.J Infect Dis. 1998 Dec;178(6):1562-6. doi: 10.1086/314504. J Infect Dis. 1998. PMID: 9815204 Clinical Trial.
-
Virological and serological aspects of immune resistance to rotavirus gastroenteritis.Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Mar;16 Suppl 2:S117-21. doi: 10.1093/clinids/16.supplement_2.s117. Clin Infect Dis. 1993. PMID: 8384012 Review.
-
Lack of correlation between serum rotavirus antibody titers and protection following vaccination with reassortant RRV vaccines. US Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy Group.Vaccine. 1995 Sep;13(13):1226-32. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(95)00060-e. Vaccine. 1995. PMID: 8578808 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Protective effect of natural rotavirus infection in an Indian birth cohort.N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 28;365(4):337-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1006261. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21793745 Free PMC article.
-
Cost effectiveness of infant vaccination for rotavirus in Canada.Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2012 Summer;23(2):71-7. doi: 10.1155/2012/327054. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2012. PMID: 23730312 Free PMC article.
-
Antigenic and genetic characterization of serotype G2 human rotavirus strains from the African continent.J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Feb;42(2):595-600. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.595-600.2004. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 14766822 Free PMC article.
-
An age-structured epidemic model of rotavirus with vaccination.J Math Biol. 2006 Oct;53(4):719-46. doi: 10.1007/s00285-006-0023-0. Epub 2006 Aug 17. J Math Biol. 2006. PMID: 16915388
-
Detection and Clinical Implications of Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccine-Derived Virus Strains in Children with Gastroenteritis in Alberta, Canada.J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Oct 19;59(11):e0115421. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01154-21. Epub 2021 Aug 18. J Clin Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 34406795 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical