Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Jan;136(1):323-31.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.1.323.

Evidence for the partial dominance of viability genes contributing to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus

Affiliations

Evidence for the partial dominance of viability genes contributing to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus

Y B Fu et al. Genetics. 1994 Jan.

Abstract

The relative importance of different modes of gene expression of viability genes contributing to inbreeding depression was investigated in the wild plant, Mimulus guttatus. Viability genes were identified by self-fertilizing 31 outbred plants, each heterozygous for three to nine unlinked allozyme markers, and analyzing segregation ratios of selfed progeny at maturity for deviations from 1:2:1 ratios. In this study, 24 linkages of viability genes to marker loci were detected. To infer the nature of gene action for these viability genes, a "model-free" graphical method was developed that examines the "space" of segregation ratios allowed by each of seven selection models (i.e., overdominance, complete recessivity, partial recessivity, additivity, partial dominance, complete dominance and underdominance). Using this method, we found that, of 24 linkages detected, 18 were consistent with either partial dominance, complete dominance or underdominance. Six were consistent with either partial recessivity, complete recessivity or overdominance. This finding indicates that, in these chromosomal segments identified by allozyme markers, partial dominance plays the predominant role in inbreeding depression. This is inconsistent with either the dominance or overdominance hypotheses proposed to account for inbreeding depression.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):823-39 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:49-78 - PubMed
    1. Trends Genet. 1992 Aug;8(8):288-94 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1991 Aug 8;352(6335):522-4 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):113-25 - PubMed

Publication types