The importance of modeling interoccasion variability in population pharmacokinetic analyses
- PMID: 8138894
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01113502
The importance of modeling interoccasion variability in population pharmacokinetic analyses
Abstract
Individual pharmacokinetic parameters may change randomly between study occasions. Analysis of simulated data with NONMEM shows that ignoring such interoccasion variability (IOV) may result in biased population parameter estimates. Particular parameters affected and the extent to which they are biased depend on study design and the magnitude of IOV and interindividual variability. Neglecting IOV also results in a high incidence of statistically significant spurious period effects. Perhaps most important, ignoring IOV can lead to a falsely optimistic impression of the potential value of therapeutic drug monitoring. A model incorporating IOV was developed and its performance in the presence and absence of IOV was evaluated. The IOV model performs well with respect to both model selection and population parameter estimation in all circumstances studied. Analysis of two real data examples using this model reveals significant IOV in all parameters for both drugs and supports the simulation findings for the case that IOV is ignored: predictable biases occur in parameter estimates and previously nonexistent period effects are found.
Similar articles
-
Interoccasion variability in population pharmacokinetic models: identifiability, influence, interdependencies and derived study design recommendations.J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2025 Apr 11;52(2):23. doi: 10.1007/s10928-025-09966-7. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2025. PMID: 40216605 Free PMC article.
-
Handling interoccasion variability in model-based dose individualization using therapeutic drug monitoring data.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;85(6):1326-1336. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13901. Epub 2019 Apr 29. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 30767254 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of different methods to evaluate population dose-response and relative potency: importance of interoccasion variability.J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1999 Feb;27(1):67-83. doi: 10.1023/a:1020682729226. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1999. PMID: 10533698 Clinical Trial.
-
Inter-study variability in population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis: when and how to estimate it?J Pharm Sci. 2000 Feb;89(2):155-67. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6017(200002)89:2<155::AID-JPS3>3.0.CO;2-2. J Pharm Sci. 2000. PMID: 10688745 Review.
-
Expanding clinical applications of population pharmacodynamic modelling.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Oct;46(4):321-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00792.x. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998. PMID: 9803979 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Population Pharmacokinetics of Clotting Factor Concentrates and Desmopressin in Hemophilia.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021 Jan;60(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00936-5. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021. PMID: 32936401 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant recipients.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(10):1083-96. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200544100-00006. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005. PMID: 16176120
-
Population pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B in pediatric patients with malignant diseases.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Mar;50(3):935-42. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.3.935-942.2006. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006. PMID: 16495254 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacodynamic models for the cardiovascular effects of moxonidine in patients with congestive heart failure.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Jan;51(1):35-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.01320.x. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001. PMID: 11167663 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
On some "disadvantages" of the population approach.AAPS J. 2005 Oct 5;7(2):E374-82. doi: 10.1208/aapsj070238. AAPS J. 2005. PMID: 16353917 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical