A randomized double-blind trial of ondansetron alone versus in combination with dexamethasone versus in combination with dexamethasone and lorazepam in the prevention of emesis due to cisplatin-based chemotherapy
- PMID: 8141107
- DOI: 10.1097/00000421-199404000-00012
A randomized double-blind trial of ondansetron alone versus in combination with dexamethasone versus in combination with dexamethasone and lorazepam in the prevention of emesis due to cisplatin-based chemotherapy
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness and side effects of antiemetic regimens using ondansetron alone (O) versus ondansetron plus dexamethasone (OD) versus ondansetron plus dexamethasone plus lorazepam (ODA) in the prevention of emesis induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
Design: Randomized, double-blind trial.
Patients and methods: In this study, 75 patients who were receiving cisplatin (60 mg/m2) on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2) on day 2 to day 6 were enrolled. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment regimens: O, OD, or ODA. The patients assigned to O regimen received ondansetron 8 mg intravenously as a loading dose 15 minutes prior to cisplatin, then 1 mg/h continuous i.v. infusion (24 mg/day) for 48 hours. OD regimen consisted of ondansetron given as above plus dexamethasone administered at a dose of 10 mg i.v. injection every 12 hours for 3 days. ODA regimen was OD regimen plus lorazepam administered at a dose of 0.5 mg orally every 6 hours for 3 days. To ensure blinding, O group patients received 10 ml placebo-saline i.v. injection every 12 hours for 3 days, and O and OD group patients received placebo tablets orally every 6 hours for 3 days.
Results: One patient did not receive assigned antiemetic regimen and was excluded from the analysis. In the acute phase, complete control of emesis was seen in 85% of all patients, and there was no significant difference among the three groups (p = .442). Complete control of nausea during the acute phase was achieved in 10 patients (41.2%) treated with O regimen alone, in 23 patients (92.0%) treated with OD regimen, and in 16 patients (64.0%) treated with ODA regimen (p < .001). In the delayed phase, 68% of patients who received the three-drug combination (ODA) and 56% of patients who received the two-drug combination (OD) obtained complete control of emesis, as opposed to 29% who were given ondansetron alone (p < .021). The incidences of headache, flushing, dry mouth, hiccups, and constipation were mild and tolerable and did not differ among the three groups.
Discussion: Ondansetron was very effective in the prevention of nausea and vomiting during the acute phase after cisplatin administration. In treating delayed nausea and vomiting, although the results of three regimens were still disappointing, the combination of ondansetron plus dexamethasone or plus lorazepam provided superior results. Patients who received the lorazepam-containing regimen appeared more comfortable and less restless than those who were given other regimens.
Similar articles
-
A multicentre, double-blind study comparing placebo, ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone for the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis. Ondansetron Delayed Emesis Study Group.Ann Oncol. 1996 Nov;7(9):945-52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010798. Ann Oncol. 1996. PMID: 9006746 Clinical Trial.
-
Ondansetron plus dexamethasone is superior to ondansetron alone in the prevention of emesis in chemotherapy-naive and previously treated patients. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).Ann Oncol. 1994 Mar;5(3):253-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058803. Ann Oncol. 1994. PMID: 8186174 Clinical Trial.
-
Optimum anti-emetic therapy for cisplatin induced emesis over repeat courses: ondansetron plus dexamethasone compared with metoclopramide, dexamethasone plus lorazepam.Ann Oncol. 1996 Mar;7(3):277-82. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010572. Ann Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8740792 Clinical Trial.
-
Oral ondansetron for the control of delayed emesis after cisplatin. Report of a phase II study and a review of completed trials to manage delayed emesis.Cancer. 1992 Aug 15;70(4 Suppl):1012-6. Cancer. 1992. PMID: 1386282 Review.
-
[Recent improvements in antiemetic therapy].Tumori. 1997;83(2 Suppl):S3-14. Tumori. 1997. PMID: 9235727 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Impact of adjuvant lorazepam with granisetron on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Support Care Cancer. 2019 Mar;27(3):895-899. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4377-9. Epub 2018 Jul 31. Support Care Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30066198
-
[Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Jan;93 Suppl 1:3-17. doi: 10.1007/BF03041988. Med Klin (Munich). 1998. PMID: 19479418 Review. German.
-
The antiemetic interaction of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol when combined with tropisetron or dexamethasone in the least shrew.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009 Jan;91(3):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Aug 9. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009. PMID: 18727934 Free PMC article.
-
A histologically derived stereotaxic atlas and substance P immunohistochemistry in the brain of the least shrew (Cryptotis parva) support its role as a model organism for behavioral and pharmacological research.Brain Res. 2007 Jul 2;1156:99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.061. Epub 2007 May 4. Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17540350 Free PMC article.
-
Initial high anti-emetic efficacy of granisetron with dexamethasone is not maintained over repeated cycles.Br J Cancer. 1998 May;77(9):1487-91. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.244. Br J Cancer. 1998. PMID: 9652766 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical