Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Dec:472:725-35.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019969.

Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man

Affiliations

Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man

A E Minetti et al. J Physiol. 1993 Dec.

Erratum in

  • J Physiol (Lond) 1994 Mar 15;475(3):548

Abstract

1. The metabolic cost and the mechanical work at different speeds during uphill, level and downhill walking have been measured in four subjects. 2. The mechanical work has been partitioned into the internal work (W(int)), due to the speed changes of body segment with respect to the body centre of mass (BCM), and the external work (W(ext)), related to the position and speed changes of the BCM in the environment. 3. W(ext) has been further divided into a positive part W+ext) and a negative one (W-(ext)), associated with the energy increases and decreases, respectively, over the stride period. 4. For all constant speeds the most economical gradient has been found to be -10.2% (+/- 0.8 S.D.). 5. At each gradient there is a unique W+ext/W-ext ratio (= 1 in level walking), regardless of speed, with a tendency for W-ext and W+ext to vanish above +15% and below -15% gradient, respectively. 6. W(int) is constant at each speed regardless of gradient. This is partly explained by an only slight decrease in stride frequency at increasing gradient. W(int) constancy implies that it has no role in determining the optimum gradient. 7. A linear multiple regression relating W+ext and W-ext to the metabolic cost at different gradients showed that negative (eff-) and positive (eff+) efficiencies decrease with increasing speed (from 0.912 to 0.726, and from 0.182 to 0.146, respectively). The eff-/eff+ ratio, however, remains rather constant (4.995 +/- 0.125 S.D.). 8. We conclude that the measured W(ext), the W+ext/W-ext partitioning and eff-/eff+ ratio, i.e. the different efficiency of the muscles used as force and brake generators, can explain the metabolic optimum gradient at about -10%.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1969 Dec 23;174(1036):315-53 - PubMed
    1. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1959 Dec;17:289-317 - PubMed
    1. Ergonomics. 1972 Mar;15(2):121-31 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1974 Mar 28;32(3):187-94 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(3):639-57 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources