Quantitative TEM analysis of the barn owl basilar papilla
- PMID: 8157497
- DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90277-1
Quantitative TEM analysis of the barn owl basilar papilla
Abstract
The morphology of the barn owl's basilar papilla was quantitatively analyzed using TEM methods. The hair-cell (HC) parameters studied in the basal two-thirds of the papilla are remarkably constant. This large portion represents an extended high frequency area, or fovea [Köppl et al. (1993) J. Comp. Physiol. A 171, 695-704]. In the apical third of the papilla, in contrast, these parameters change regularly, as they do in other avian species. The HC in the most neural position remain morphologically more similar along the entire length of the papilla than do neighbouring cell rows. In the behaviourally most important frequency range (4-9 kHz), the afferent innervation of these neural HC is very dense and is reminiscent of the situation in mammals. Differences in HC morphology also indicate a specialization of the extreme apex of the papilla in the barn owl. Avian HC morphology is not correlated with a specific place along the basilar papilla but rather with the best frequency. Based on the body of recent quantitative morphological data on avian HC structure, a modified definition of HC types in birds is suggested (while keeping introduced terms): THC (tall hair cells) are defined as all those HC with afferent (and normally also efferent) innervation. SHC (short hair cells) are the (more specialized) HC without afferent innervation; obviously their function is restricted to the papilla itself.
Similar articles
-
Quantitative analysis of the innervation of the chicken basilar papilla.Hear Res. 1992 Aug;61(1-2):167-78. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90048-r. Hear Res. 1992. PMID: 1526890
-
Hair cell morphology and innervation in the basilar papilla of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae).Hear Res. 1998 Jul;121(1-2):112-24. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00072-0. Hear Res. 1998. PMID: 9682814
-
General pattern and morphological specializations of the avian cochlea.Scanning Microsc. 1994;8(2):351-63; discussion 363-4. Scanning Microsc. 1994. PMID: 7701304
-
The basilar papilla of the barn owl Tyto alba: a quantitative morphological SEM analysis.Hear Res. 1988 Jul 1;34(1):87-101. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90053-6. Hear Res. 1988. PMID: 3403388
-
Birds--same thing, but different? Convergent evolution in the avian and mammalian auditory systems provides informative comparative models.Hear Res. 2011 Mar;273(1-2):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.03.095. Epub 2010 Apr 27. Hear Res. 2011. PMID: 20430083 Review.
Cited by
-
Otoacoustic Emissions in Non-Mammals.Audiol Res. 2022 May 11;12(3):260-272. doi: 10.3390/audiolres12030027. Audiol Res. 2022. PMID: 35645197 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Synaptic ribbon enables temporal precision of hair cell afferent synapse by increasing the number of readily releasable vesicles: a modeling study.J Neurophysiol. 2008 Oct;100(4):1724-39. doi: 10.1152/jn.90322.2008. Epub 2008 Jul 30. J Neurophysiol. 2008. PMID: 18667546 Free PMC article.
-
Of mice and chickens: Revisiting the RC time constant problem.Hear Res. 2022 Sep 15;423:108422. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108422. Epub 2021 Dec 17. Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 34965897 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inner-ear morphology of the New Zealand kiwi (Apteryx mantelli) suggests high-frequency specialization.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Oct;13(5):629-39. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0341-4. Epub 2012 Jul 7. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012. PMID: 22772440 Free PMC article.
-
Hair cell regeneration in the bird cochlea following noise damage or ototoxic drug damage.Anat Embryol (Berl). 1994 Jan;189(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/BF00193125. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1994. PMID: 8192233 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous