Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation
- PMID: 8163974
- DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-x
Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation
Abstract
From 1982 to 1988, 147 cemented acetabular components were revised with cementless hemispheric press-fit components, with an average follow-up period of 5.7 years (range, 3-9 years). Acetabular defects were typed from 1 to 3 and reconstructed with a bulk or support allograft. Type 1 defects had bone lysis around cement anchor sites and required particulate graft. Type 2A and B defects displayed progressive bone loss superiorly and required particulate graft, femoral head bulk graft, or cup superiorization. Type 2C defects required medial wall repair with wafer femoral head graft. Type 3A and B defects demonstrated progressive amounts of superior rim deficiencies and were treated with structural distal femur or proximal tibia allograft. Six of the 147 components (4.0%), all type 3B, were considered radiographically and clinically unstable, warranting revision. Three of the six were revised. Moderate lateral allograft resorption was noted on radiographs, but host-graft union was confirmed at revision. Size, orientation, and method of fixation of the allografts play an important role in the integrity of structural allografts, while adequate remaining host-bone must be present to ensure bone ingrowth.
Similar articles
-
THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3882-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4483-7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 26245166 Free PMC article.
-
Revision of the acetabular component without cement after a previous acetabular reconstruction with use of a bulk femoral head graft in patients who had congenital dislocation or dysplasia. A follow-up note.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Dec;81(12):1703-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199912000-00007. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999. PMID: 10608381
-
[Structural femoral head allografts in revision surgery of loosened acetabular cups].Unfallchirurg. 2007 Feb;110(2):104-10. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1195-1. Unfallchirurg. 2007. PMID: 17109174 German.
-
The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Surgical technique.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88 Suppl 1 Pt 1:92-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00903. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006. PMID: 16510803 Review.
-
Bone defect determines acetabular revision surgery.Hip Int. 2014 Oct 2;24 Suppl 10:S33-6. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000162. Hip Int. 2014. PMID: 24970036 Review.
Cited by
-
Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up.Int Orthop. 2013 Apr;37(4):605-10. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1818-4. Epub 2013 Feb 20. Int Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23423427 Free PMC article.
-
The use of augmented antibiotic-loaded cement spacer in periprosthetic joint infection patients with acetabular bone defect.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 1;15(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01831-2. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 32998728 Free PMC article.
-
Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3156-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2514-1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 23001499 Free PMC article.
-
Total hip arthroplasty-related pelvic pseudotumor: Unusual presentation with hydronephrosis.Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Aug;50(4):470-2. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 Jul 15. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016. PMID: 27424805 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
[Exchange of acetabular cups with severe bone defects using antiprotrusion cages].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Jul;22(3):256-67. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-8025-x. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010. PMID: 20676820 German.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical