Comparison of hip force calculations and measurements in the same patient
- PMID: 8163975
- DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90136-8
Comparison of hip force calculations and measurements in the same patient
Abstract
Many investigations report hip-contact-force estimates based either on mathematical models or on the output of instrumented implants. Data from instrumented implants have been consistently lower than mathematical predictions. The authors compared mathematical estimates derived from gait laboratory observations made in a patient with an instrumented hip implant. Appropriate modifications to past models resulted in force predictions that were reasonably similar to the output of the instrumented implant. Peak resultant forces were in the range of 2.5-3.5 body weight during level walking at a freely selected speed, while peak out-of-plane forces ranged from 0.6 to 0.9 body weight. Previous parametric hip-force predictions resulting from mathematically modeled surgical alterations may be high insofar as absolute peak values, but trends are likely correct.
Similar articles
-
Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities.J Biomech. 2001 Jul;34(7):859-71. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00040-9. J Biomech. 2001. PMID: 11410170
-
Direct comparison of calculated hip joint contact forces with those measured using instrumented implants. An evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the lower limb.J Biomech. 2003 Jul;36(7):929-36. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00072-1. J Biomech. 2003. PMID: 12757801
-
Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients.J Biomech. 1993 Aug;26(8):969-90. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90058-m. J Biomech. 1993. PMID: 8349721 Review.
-
Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988 Jan;70(1):45-50. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988. PMID: 3335573
-
Contributions to the understanding of gait control.Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4823. Dan Med J. 2014. PMID: 24814597 Review.
Cited by
-
Refining muscle geometry and wrapping in the TLEM 2 model for improved hip contact force prediction.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 17;13(9):e0204109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204109. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30222777 Free PMC article.
-
Musculoskeletal Modeling of the Wrist via a Multi Body Simulation.Life (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;12(4):581. doi: 10.3390/life12040581. Life (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35455073 Free PMC article.
-
A Novel Approach for Dynamic Testing of Total Hip Dislocation under Physiological Conditions.PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145798. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26717236 Free PMC article.
-
[Musculoskeletal biomechanics of the knee joint. Principles of preoperative planning for osteotomy and joint replacement].Orthopade. 2007 Jul;36(7):628-34. doi: 10.1007/s00132-007-1115-2. Orthopade. 2007. PMID: 17605127 Review. German.
-
Contributions of individual muscle forces to hip, knee, and ankle contact forces during the stance phase of running: a model-based study.Health Inf Sci Syst. 2022 Jun 16;10(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s13755-022-00177-9. eCollection 2022 Dec. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2022. PMID: 35719242 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous