Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1994 Jan;241(3):132-7.
doi: 10.1007/BF00868339.

Sensitivities and predictive values of paraclinical tests for diagnosing multiple sclerosis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Sensitivities and predictive values of paraclinical tests for diagnosing multiple sclerosis

G Filippini et al. J Neurol. 1994 Jan.

Abstract

The sensitivities and predictive values of visual, somatosensory, and brain auditory evoked potentials (EPs), cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal banding (CSF-OB) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were evaluated for the early diagnosis of clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS). Paraclinical evidence of asymptomatic lesions allows a diagnosis of CDMS. Eighty-two patients in whom MS was suspected but diagnosis of CDMS was not possible entered the study prospectively. Paraclinical examinations were performed at entry. Patients were examined and underwent EPs every 6 months, and MRI yearly. After a mean follow-up of 2.9 years, 28 patients (34%) had developed CDMS (McDonald-Halliday criteria). The initial MRI was strongly suggestive of MS in 19 of these (68%), while 27 (96%) had at least one MS-like abnormality in the initial MRI. CSF-OB and EPs had lower sensitivities. CDMS developed during follow-up in 19 of the 36 patients (53%) who had an initial MRI strongly suggestive of MS but in only 1 of the 25 who had normal MRI when first studied. These results support previous conclusions that MRI is the most sensitive test for detecting white matter asymptomatic lesions, and the most predictive for the diagnosis of CDMS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neurology. 1991 Jan;41(1):15-9 - PubMed
    1. Brain. 1983 Dec;106 ( Pt 4):809-16 - PubMed
    1. Can J Neurol Sci. 1980 Nov;7(4):275-80 - PubMed
    1. Br Med Bull. 1977 Jan;33(1):4-9 - PubMed
    1. Neurology. 1991 May;41(5):657-60 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources