Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 May 1;150(9):1449-54.

Evaluation of red blood cell transfusion practices with the use of preset criteria

Affiliations

Evaluation of red blood cell transfusion practices with the use of preset criteria

W A Ghali et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess current red blood cell (RBC) transfusion practices and to determine the potential impact of implementing recently published guidelines on RBC transfusion from the American College of Physicians (ACP).

Design: Medical chart review.

Setting: A 219-bed teaching hospital in Kingston, Ont.

Participants: All patients over 12 years of age who received RBC transfusions in March 1992.

Main outcome measures: Need for transfusion according to the ACP guidelines and the number of blood units ordered for each transfusion.

Results: A total of 55 patients received 170 RBC units. According to the ACP guidelines 94 (55.3%) of the units were judged unnecessary. The departments of Surgery and Internal Medicine did not differ significantly in the number of unnecessary units (56.4% v. 52.8%). Among the surgical subspecialties, unnecessary transfusion was most common in the orthopedics service (73.5%, p < 0.05). Blood was most frequently ordered 2 units at a time (51.8% of units). Transfusion in normovolemic, hemodynamically stable patients with anemia and unnecessary multiple-unit transfusions were the most common violations of the ACP guidelines.

Conclusions: According to the ACP guidelines, there was significant unnecessary blood use in the hospital surveyed. The guidelines provide a useful framework for assessing transfusion practices but may require further refinement to apply to a broader spectrum of clinical settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Transfusion. 1989 May;29(4):298-303 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jul 20;321(3):158-63 - PubMed
    1. Transfusion. 1989 Jul-Aug;29(6):473-6 - PubMed
    1. Transfusion. 1965 Jan-Feb;5:82-8 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1990 May 24;322(21):1488-93 - PubMed