Barrier protection with examination gloves: double versus single
- PMID: 8172370
- DOI: 10.1016/0196-6553(94)90085-x
Barrier protection with examination gloves: double versus single
Abstract
In a series of experiments, the barrier integrity of single and double vinyl and latex examination gloves were tested for dye and water leaks after being placed under stress. A total of 886 examination gloves (385 vinyl: single, 199; double, 186; and 501 latex: single, 290; double, 211) were tested with a standardized clinical protocol designed to mimic patient care activities. Leakage rates for single or double gloving were significantly higher for vinyl than for latex gloves. Single vinyl gloves were significantly more likely to leak than were double vinyl gloves (51.3% and 19.7%, p < 0.0001). However, there were essentially no differences in leakage rates for single or double latex gloves (4.1% and 3.8%, p = 1). Significantly higher rates of leakage were identified with the water leak test than with the dye test for vinyl (p < 0.001) but not for latex (p = 0.22) gloves. For vinyl but not latex gloves, there were significant differences in leakage rates by brand. We conclude that double gloving offers little advantage during routine procedures associated with minimal stress to the gloves or when latex gloves are worn.
Similar articles
-
In-use barrier integrity of gloves: latex and nitrile superior to vinyl.Am J Infect Control. 1999 Oct;27(5):405-10. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70006-4. Am J Infect Control. 1999. PMID: 10511487
-
Barrier durability of latex and vinyl medical gloves in clinical settings.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1997 Sep;58(9):672-6. doi: 10.1080/15428119791012487. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1997. PMID: 11419481
-
Leakage of latex and vinyl exam gloves in high and low risk clinical settings.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993 Jan;54(1):22-6. doi: 10.1080/15298669391354261. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993. PMID: 8470620
-
Permeability of latex and thermoplastic elastomer gloves to the bacteriophage phi X174.Am J Infect Control. 1993 Dec;21(6):289-96. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(93)90385-h. Am J Infect Control. 1993. PMID: 8122800 Review.
-
Handling chemotherapy drugs-Do medical gloves really protect?Int J Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;137(8):1800-5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29058. Epub 2014 Jul 22. Int J Cancer. 2015. PMID: 24978061 Review.
Cited by
-
2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S65-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.007. Am J Infect Control. 2007. PMID: 18068815 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Chitosan and Natural Rubber Latex Biocomposite Prepared by Incorporating Negatively Charged Chitosan Dispersion.Molecules. 2020 Jun 16;25(12):2777. doi: 10.3390/molecules25122777. Molecules. 2020. PMID: 32560165 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances.Am J Infect Control. 2011 Mar;39(2):104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Sep 25. Am J Infect Control. 2011. PMID: 20869790 Free PMC article.
-
Recommended practices for prevention of transmissible infections in the perioperative practice setting.AORN J. 2007 Feb;85(2):383-96. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(07)60049-0. AORN J. 2007. PMID: 17328148 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 16855997 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources