Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 May;84(5):788-92.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.5.788.

The use of vitamin supplements and the risk of cataract among US male physicians

Affiliations

The use of vitamin supplements and the risk of cataract among US male physicians

J M Seddon et al. Am J Public Health. 1994 May.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine prospectively the association between reported use of vitamin supplements and risk of cataract and cataract extraction.

Methods: The study population consisted of 17,744 participants in the Physicians' Health Study, a randomized trial of aspirin therapy and beta-carotene among US male physicians 40 to 84 years of age in 1982 who did not report cataract at baseline and provided complete information about vitamin supplementation and other risk factors for cataract. Self-reports of cataract and cataract extraction were confirmed by medical record review.

Results: During 60 months of follow-up, there were 370 incident cataracts and 109 cataract extractions. In comparison with physicians who did not use any supplements, those who took only multivitamins had a relative risk of cataract of 0.73 after adjustment for other risk factors. For cataract extraction, the corresponding relative risk was 0.79. Use of vitamin C and/or E supplements alone was not associated with a reduced risk of cataract, but the size of this subgroup was small.

Conclusions: These data suggest that men who took multivitamin supplements tended to experience a decreased risk of cataract and support the need for rigorous testing of this hypothesis in large-scale randomized trials in men and women.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Feb;103(2):226-35 - PubMed
    1. Epidemiology. 1993 May;4(3):195-203 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1977 May;105(5):488-95 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmic Res. 1982;14(3):167-75 - PubMed
    1. Photochem Photobiol. 1982 Dec;36(6):623-6 - PubMed

Publication types