British family heart study: its design and method, and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors
- PMID: 8179948
- PMCID: PMC1238785
British family heart study: its design and method, and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this paper is to describe the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in families screened systematically by nurses in British general practice, and in subgroups with reported hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes and coronary heart disease.
Method: Twenty six general practices (13 intervention and 13 control practices) in 13 towns in England, Wales and Scotland were involved in a randomized control trial. Randomly ordered invitations were sent for a family health check to 4158 households (men aged 40-59 years and their partners) registered with the 13 intervention practices.
Results: One or more adult members from 2373 households (57%) were screened; in 1477 visits the selected man and his female partner attended of whom 98% were married. In all, 3850 individuals were screened (2246 men and 1604 women); 15% of men and women were in the predefined top quintile of the British family heart study risk score. Twenty four per cent of men and 22% of women smoked cigarettes and 62% of men and 44% of women were overweight (body mass index 25+). One third of men and one sixth of women with no known history of high blood pressure had a diastolic blood pressure of 90+ mmHg. Among the 491 individuals with previously reported high blood pressure 64% were not adequately controlled, having a diastolic blood pressure of 90+ mmHg, while 26% had diastolic blood pressure of 100+ mmHg. Eighteen per cent of men and women with no known history of a high cholesterol level had a random cholesterol level of 6.5+ mmol l-1. In the 173 people with a previously reported high cholesterol level and who had their level measured over half had a cholesterol level of 6.5+ mmol l-1 and in 7% this level was 8.0+ mmol l-1. One per cent of men and 0.3% of women were newly identified as diabetic (random glucose level of 10.0+ mmol l-1). In the 52 with previously diagnosed diabetes unsatisfactory control was found in 52% (random level of 10.0+ mmol l-1). A total of 3034 men and women overall (79%) qualified for follow up for one or more risk factor; 1909 men (85%) and 1125 women (70%). Among the 139 with pre-existing coronary heart disease 119 (86%) had modifiable risk factors: 27% were cigarette smokers, 68% had a body mass index of 25+, 40% had diastolic hypertension, 29% had hypercholesterolaemia and 19% had hyperglycaemia. Five per cent of men and women were taking antihypertensive drugs, 0.3% cholesterol lowering drugs and 0.7% drugs for diabetes.
Conclusion: There is considerable scope for primary and secondary prevention among families registered with general practices, but whether nursing and medical intervention can reduce the risk factors related to cardiovascular disease in this setting remains unknown.
Comment in
-
Health checks--time to check out?Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Feb;44(379):51-2. Br J Gen Pract. 1994. PMID: 8179945 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Established cardiovascular disease and CVD risk factors in a primary care population of middle-aged Irish men and women.Ir Med J. 2002 Nov-Dec;95(10):298-301. Ir Med J. 2002. PMID: 12542011
-
Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study. Family Heart Study Group.BMJ. 1994 Jan 29;308(6924):313-20. BMJ. 1994. PMID: 8124121 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Geographical variation in cardiovascular disease, risk factors, and their control in older women: British Women's Heart and Health Study.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Feb;57(2):134-40. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.2.134. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003. PMID: 12540690 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic interactions between cardiovascular risk factors.Dan Med J. 2014 Jul;61(7):B4892. Dan Med J. 2014. PMID: 25123126 Review.
-
Place of birth and adult cardiovascular disease: the British Regional Heart Study.Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1991;373:73-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1991.tb18154.x. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1991. PMID: 1927532 Review.
Cited by
-
Screening for increased cardiometabolic risk in primary care: a systematic review.Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Oct;64(627):e616-26. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X681781. Br J Gen Pract. 2014. PMID: 25267047 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jan;64(618):e47-53. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X676456. Br J Gen Pract. 2014. PMID: 24567582 Free PMC article.
-
Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 14;3(3):CD006887. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006887.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28290160 Free PMC article.
-
Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29243221 Free PMC article.
-
Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Mar 20;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-60. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008. PMID: 18366711 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources