Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994;97(3):471-6.
doi: 10.1007/BF00241541.

Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions

Affiliations

Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions

H Bekkering et al. Exp Brain Res. 1994.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate whether ocular and hand motor systems operate independently or whether they share processes. Using dual-task methodology, reaction time (RT) latencies of saccadic eye and hand motor responses were measured. In experiment 1, the hand and eye motor systems produced rapid, aimed pointing movements to a visual target, which could occur either to the left or right of a central fixation point. Results showed that RT latencies of the eye response were slower in the dual-task condition than in the single-task condition, whereas the RT latencies of the hand response were virtually the same in both conditions. This interference effect indicated that the ocular and manual motor systems are not operating independently when initiating saccadic eye and goal-directed hand movements. Experiment 2 employed the same experimental paradigm as experiment 1, except for one important modification. Instead of a goal-directed hand movement to the target stimulus, subjects had to make a button-press response with either the index or middle finger of the right hand dependent upon whether the stimulus occurred to the right or left of the control fixation point. The aim of experiment 2 was to investigate the issue whether the observed interference effect in experiment 1 was specific or non-specific (e.g. overhead costs due to coordinating any two responses). The finding that saccadic eye movements and button-press responses in the dual-task condition could be initiated without delay relative to the single-task conditions, supports the specific interference interpretation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biol Cybern. 1986;55(4):253-61 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1991;85(3):682-90 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1984;56(1):154-61 - PubMed
    1. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1988 Jan;26(1):20-6 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1986;62(2):293-302 - PubMed