Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions
- PMID: 8187858
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00241541
Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions
Abstract
The goal of this study was to investigate whether ocular and hand motor systems operate independently or whether they share processes. Using dual-task methodology, reaction time (RT) latencies of saccadic eye and hand motor responses were measured. In experiment 1, the hand and eye motor systems produced rapid, aimed pointing movements to a visual target, which could occur either to the left or right of a central fixation point. Results showed that RT latencies of the eye response were slower in the dual-task condition than in the single-task condition, whereas the RT latencies of the hand response were virtually the same in both conditions. This interference effect indicated that the ocular and manual motor systems are not operating independently when initiating saccadic eye and goal-directed hand movements. Experiment 2 employed the same experimental paradigm as experiment 1, except for one important modification. Instead of a goal-directed hand movement to the target stimulus, subjects had to make a button-press response with either the index or middle finger of the right hand dependent upon whether the stimulus occurred to the right or left of the control fixation point. The aim of experiment 2 was to investigate the issue whether the observed interference effect in experiment 1 was specific or non-specific (e.g. overhead costs due to coordinating any two responses). The finding that saccadic eye movements and button-press responses in the dual-task condition could be initiated without delay relative to the single-task conditions, supports the specific interference interpretation.
Similar articles
-
The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements.Exp Brain Res. 2005 Apr;162(2):220-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2146-0. Epub 2004 Dec 15. Exp Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 15599726
-
Preparing coordinated eye and hand movements: dual-task costs are not attentional.J Vis. 2010 Dec 20;10(14):23. doi: 10.1167/10.14.23. J Vis. 2010. PMID: 21172898
-
Interference between saccadic eye and goal-directed hand movements.Exp Brain Res. 1995;106(3):475-84. doi: 10.1007/BF00231070. Exp Brain Res. 1995. PMID: 8983991
-
Ocular gaze is anchored to the target of an ongoing pointing movement.J Neurophysiol. 2000 Feb;83(2):639-51. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.2.639. J Neurophysiol. 2000. PMID: 10669480
-
Computational Mechanisms Mediating Inhibitory Control of Coordinated Eye-Hand Movements.Brain Sci. 2021 May 10;11(5):607. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050607. Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 34068477 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Stopping eyes and hands: evidence for non-independence of stop and go processes and for a separation of central and peripheral inhibition.Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Feb 18;8:61. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00061. eCollection 2014. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24600371 Free PMC article.
-
The brain uses efference copy information to optimise spatial memory.Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jan;224(2):189-97. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3298-y. Epub 2012 Oct 17. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23073714
-
Motor planning perturbation: muscle activation and reaction time.J Neurophysiol. 2018 Oct 1;120(4):2059-2065. doi: 10.1152/jn.00323.2018. Epub 2018 Jun 27. J Neurophysiol. 2018. PMID: 29947595 Free PMC article.
-
A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements.J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jun 1;115(5):2470-84. doi: 10.1152/jn.00910.2015. Epub 2016 Feb 17. J Neurophysiol. 2016. PMID: 26888104 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence of common and separate eye and hand accumulators underlying flexible eye-hand coordination.J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan 1;117(1):348-364. doi: 10.1152/jn.00688.2016. Epub 2016 Oct 26. J Neurophysiol. 2017. PMID: 27784809 Free PMC article.