Evidence against early selection: stimulus quality effects in previewed displays
- PMID: 8189191
- DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.2.259
Evidence against early selection: stimulus quality effects in previewed displays
Abstract
H. Pashler (1984) reported that when subjects identified a probed letter in a display of 8 characters, the effect of stimulus quality on reaction time persisted full blown even when subjects had 300 ms to preprocess the display. Pashler argued that these results are incompatible with theories of late selection but that they are naturally accommodated by theories of early selection. The authors report 14 experiments using Pashler's methodology in which the effects of stimulus quality were reliably attenuated with a preview of the letter array. Pashler's results were also replicated, but only under a narrow set of conditions. Several "early selection" accounts of the interaction of probe delay with stimulus quality were examined and rejected in favor of a late selection account.
Comment on
-
Evidence against late selection: stimulus quality effects in previewed displays.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):429-48. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.3.429. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984. PMID: 6242417
Similar articles
-
Early and late selection in partial report: evidence from degraded displays.Percept Psychophys. 1991 Sep;50(3):258-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03206749. Percept Psychophys. 1991. PMID: 1754367
-
Evidence against late selection: stimulus quality effects in previewed displays.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):429-48. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.3.429. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984. PMID: 6242417
-
On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):135-49. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.135. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990. PMID: 2137515
-
History matters: the preview benefit in search is not onset capture.Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):181-5. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01439. Psychol Sci. 2003. PMID: 12661682
-
How much processing do nonattended stimuli receive? Apparently very little, but...Percept Psychophys. 1990 May;47(5):477-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03208181. Percept Psychophys. 1990. PMID: 2349060
Cited by
-
When do nonwords activate semantics? Implications for models of visual word recognition.Mem Cognit. 1998 Jan;26(1):61-74. doi: 10.3758/bf03211370. Mem Cognit. 1998. PMID: 9519697
-
Is attention needed for word identification? Evidence from the Stroop paradigm.Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Oct;15(5):950-5. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.950. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008. PMID: 18926987
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources