Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1994 Mar;48(3):164-71.

Estimation in community surveys of total body fat of children using bioelectrical impedance or skinfold thickness measurements

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8194501
Comparative Study

Estimation in community surveys of total body fat of children using bioelectrical impedance or skinfold thickness measurements

J Hammond et al. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1994 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To compare skinfold thickness measurements with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) as a measure of body fat for use in a survey of children (the National Study of Health and Growth).

Design: Part cross-sectional, part repeated measurement study.

Setting: A junior school in Bath.

Subjects: 42 boys and 33 girls aged from 9 to 11 years.

Interventions: Measurements of BIA, height, weight, and triceps, biceps, subscapular and suprailiac skinfolds.

Results: All measurements were highly repeatable with intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.90. The level of agreement between estimates of percentage of body fat derived from prediction equations based on impedance or skinfold measurements respectively was poor: the mean difference (impedance estimate minus skinfold estimate) was 4.67% (95% range -3.47 to 12.82) for boys and 7.81% (95% range 1.27 to 14.34) for girls. The two estimates were found to correlate highly (r = 0.83 for boys and r = 0.81 for girls) because weight, used to convert estimates of fat-free mass derived from impedance to fat mass, was highly correlated with impedance and moderately highly correlated with skinfold thicknesses. The correlations of resistance (R) and (H)2/R with skinfold thicknesses were very low. There was a moderate correlation of R and H2/R with log(weight-for-height index), but lower than that of log(weight-for-height index) with each of the skinfolds.

Conclusions: As currently available equations for converting impedance-based estimates of total body water to fat mass are not fully developed for use in children of varying ages, estimates of body fat calculated from skinfold thickness measurements remain preferable in epidemiological studies of children's health and growth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources