Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Mar;32(3):623-8.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.3.623-628.1994.

Use of PCR-enzyme immunoassay for identification of influenza A virus matrix RNA in clinical samples negative for cultivable virus

Affiliations

Use of PCR-enzyme immunoassay for identification of influenza A virus matrix RNA in clinical samples negative for cultivable virus

T Cherian et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Mar.

Abstract

Influenza A virus infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Standard diagnostic methods either are not efficient in identifying infected individuals in a timely manner or lack sensitivity. We developed a PCR-enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) for the detection of influenza A virus RNA in respiratory secretions. A reverse transcription PCR was performed with oligonucleotide primers directed at a highly conserved area of the influenza A matrix gene. Amplified DNA was identified by hybridization in solution to a nested biotinylated RNA probe and quantitated in an EIA. PCR-EIA detected small quantities of RNA from the three prevalent subtypes of human influenza A virus. Influenza B and C, parainfluenza, measles, mumps, and respiratory syncytial viruses tested negative. The potential efficiency of PCR-EIA for use in clinical diagnosis was determined by testing 90 nasal wash specimens obtained daily over a 10-day period from nine human volunteers infected with influenza A virus. Thirty-seven of the postinfection samples had detectable influenza A virus RNA by PCR-EIA, whereas only 26 postinfection samples were positive by culture. PCR-EIA was particularly efficient for the identification of influenza A virus in samples obtained more than 4 days after infection. Seventeen of 45 such samples were positive, whereas virus was cultivated from 4 samples (P < 0.00005). All preinfection samples from volunteers subsequently infected with influenza A virus were negative by PCR-EIA, as were samples from a volunteer infected with parainfluenza virus type 3. Nucleic acid amplification techniques represent important tools for the timely and sensitive diagnosis of influenza A virus infections and, therefore, their management and control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br Med J. 1971 Feb 13;1(5745):369-73 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1993 Mar;167(3):593-601 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Apr;109(4):464-79 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jul;10(1):32-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jun;9(6):688-92 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms