Bacterial contamination of platelets at a university hospital: increased identification due to intensified surveillance
- PMID: 8201239
- DOI: 10.1086/646866
Bacterial contamination of platelets at a university hospital: increased identification due to intensified surveillance
Abstract
Background: A cluster of bacterial contamination of platelets occurred at a university hospital in a one-month period. This unusual clustering allowed us to examine the likely mechanism of contamination and clinical sequelae.
Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients receiving random donor platelet transfusions to determine numbers of platelets transfused, reactions reported, and episodes of bacterial contamination. We also reviewed procedures at the collecting blood agencies and the hospital blood bank.
Results: Four patients received bacterially contaminated platelets during June and July 1991. The rates of reported platelet transfusion reactions increased significantly (P < 0.001) from September 1989 through July 1991 (study period); in addition, the rate of contamination of platelets during June and July 1991 was 23-fold higher than during the previous 21 months (P < 0.001). Surveillance methodology changed dramatically during the study period, contributing to the recognition of the current cluster. Pathogens isolated from the contaminated platelet pools were Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa in titers ranging from 10(6) to 10(8) colony forming units/mL. Four constituent individual platelet units identified as the probable cause of the outbreak (including one postepidemic episode) were significantly older (mean age, 4.8 days) than 106 randomly selected individual platelet units (mean age, 3.7 days; P = 0.04). Platelet pools were transfused an average of 2.5 hours after pooling. Review of blood collection and platelet preparation practices did not identify breaks in procedure or technique that could have caused contamination.
Conclusions: Increased awareness of platelet transfusion reactions by clinical staff and routine culturing of all platelets associated with transfusion reactions will identify contaminated platelets. Identification of contaminated platelets is necessary to treat affected patients appropriately and to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for contaminated platelets (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:82-87).
Similar articles
-
A prospective microbiologic surveillance program to detect and prevent the transfusion of bacterially contaminated platelets.Transfusion. 1993 Nov-Dec;33(11):902-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.331194082380.x. Transfusion. 1993. PMID: 8259595
-
Evolution of surveillance methods for detection of bacterial contamination of platelets in a university hospital, 1991 through 2004.Transfusion. 2006 May;46(5):719-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00790.x. Transfusion. 2006. PMID: 16686839
-
Detection of septic transfusion reactions to platelet transfusions by active and passive surveillance.Blood. 2016 Jan 28;127(4):496-502. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-655944. Epub 2015 Nov 23. Blood. 2016. PMID: 26598718
-
Detecting bacterial contamination in platelet products.Clin Lab. 2006;52(9-10):443-56. Clin Lab. 2006. PMID: 17078471 Review.
-
Bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates: incidence, significance, and prevention.Semin Hematol. 2001 Oct;38(4 Suppl 11):20-6. doi: 10.1016/s0037-1963(01)90120-9. Semin Hematol. 2001. PMID: 11727282 Review.
Cited by
-
Septic shock during platelet transfusion in a patient with acute myeloid leukaemia.BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Oct 30;2013:bcr2013010412. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-010412. BMJ Case Rep. 2013. PMID: 24172770 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical