Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Jun;23(6):788-93.
doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80130-2.

Glomerular and tubular factors in urine flow rates of acute renal failure patients

Affiliations

Glomerular and tubular factors in urine flow rates of acute renal failure patients

S N Rahman et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994 Jun.

Abstract

Distinguishing between oliguric and nonoliguric acute renal failure (ARF) has clinical relevance. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the pathophysiologic basis for variations in urine flow rates in ARF. This study was designed to determine whether differences in residual levels of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or differences in tubular reabsorption of filtered solutes and H2O accounted for the variations in urine flow rates among ARF patients. Twenty-five patients with ARF of 3 to 6 days duration having ischemic and nephrotoxic etiologies, increasing serum creatinines of more than 0.7 mg/dL/d, urine sodium concentrations and fractional excretions of sodium (FENa) of more than 20 mEq/L and more than 1%, respectively, 12 hours after stopping diuretics and urine sediments consistent with acute tubular necrosis were studied. Urine and serum collections were made over an 8-hour period to determine creatinine clearance (Ccr), filtered osmolar load, urine to serum creatinine ratio (U/Scr), urine to serum creatinine osmolality (U/Sosm), and FENa. These were compared with urine flow rates. Creatinine clearance was validated as an estimate of GFR in ARF with simultaneous inulin clearances x 12 measurements (r = 0.935, P < 0.001). Residual Ccr was strongly correlated with urine flow rate (r = 0.857, P < 0.001), as was filtered osmolar load (r = 0.810, P < 0.001). However, the latter relationship was totally dependent on Ccr. There was no correlation between U/Scr, U/Sosm, or FENa and urine flow rates. It is concluded that the residual level of GFR is the primary determinant of variations in urine flow rate in patients with ARF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources