Similar articles

• Comparison of nonionic contrast agents iohexol and iotrolan for cisternal myelography in dogs.

  van Bree H, Van Rijssen B, Van Ham L. van Bree H, et al. Am J Vet Res. 1991 Jun;52(6):926-33. Am J Vet Res. 1991. PMID: 1883098
• The difference of contrast effects of myelography in normal dogs: comparison of iohexol (180 mgI/ml), iohexol (240 mgI/ml) and iotrolan (240 mgI/ml).

  Shimizu J, Yamada K, Kishimoto M, Iwasaki T, Miyake Y. Shimizu J, et al. J Vet Med Sci. 2008 Jul;70(7):659-63. doi: 10.1292/jvms.70.659. J Vet Med Sci. 2008. PMID: 18685236
• Renal excretion and computed tomography enhancement of iotrolan and iopamidol in dogs.

  Benness G, Evill C, Wilcox J, Hassam R, Arozoo E. Benness G, et al. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd. 1989;128:88-90. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd. 1989. PMID: 2568815
• [Use of iotrol for myelography].

  Sviridov NK, Andreeva MN. Sviridov NK, et al. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 1988 Jan-Feb;(1):50-1. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 1988. PMID: 3284260 Review. Russian. No abstract available.
• [Clinical use of non-ionic dimers].

  Sinitsyn VE. Sinitsyn VE. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol. 1997 Nov-Dec;(6):41-2. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol. 1997. PMID: 9504000 Review. Russian. No abstract available.