Patient satisfaction with communication in general surgery: problems of measurement and improvement

Abstract

The research reported here is taken from a pilot inquiry into patient experiences of general surgery provided in National Health Service hospitals. This study sought to identify how the cross section of patients facing general surgery experienced communication and information problems particular to their surgical 'settings', how such discontent is understood or rationalised by them, and consequently how it would be reported to relatives or researchers. Drawing on interviews with patients and surgical staff, the paper explores the range of communication difficulties facing certain types of patient which arise from the hospital setting and the routines and rituals of service providers. While it is concluded that communication should be explored with some reference to disease classification, this should not divert attention from the general context of care to the unique circumstances of patient or surgeon. It is questioned whether patients are always disposed to rationalise their difficulties in terms of 'dissatisfaction' in the way required by survey research. Drawing on interview-generated comments by patients and staff, the paper illustrates less obvious validity problems for patient satisfaction studies, and addresses briefly questionnaire design which may account for them.