Nasogastric decompression following elective colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized study
- PMID: 8214960
Nasogastric decompression following elective colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized study
Abstract
A prospective, randomized study was conducted to determine the need for nasogastric decompression following elective colorectal surgery for malignant and premalignant lesions. Seventy-seven consecutive patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1--nasogastric decompression was maintained postoperatively until resumption of bowel function; Group 2--the nasogastric tube was removed in the recovery room. Forty patients were assigned to Group 1 (21 males, 19 females) and 37 to Group 2 (22 males and 15 females). Eleven patients in Group 1 (28%) developed nausea postoperatively, with six patients (15%) having an average of less than two emeses and five (12%) requiring nasogastric reintubation. Thirteen patients in Group 2 (35%) developed nausea, with 10 patients (27%) having an average of two emeses and three (8%) requiring nasogastric intubation (P = 0.80). Abdominal distention was observed in 13 patients (32%) in both Group 1 (32%) and Group 2 (35%). Two of the latter patients required nasogastric reintubation. Postoperative fever was noted in 23 patients (58%) in Group 1 and 14 (38%) in Group 2 (P = 0.13); atelectasis was diagnosed in 38 per cent of patients in Group 1 and 14 per cent in Group 2 (P = 0.03). These data support that nasogastric decompression is not necessary following elective colorectal surgery for malignant and premalignant lesions.
Similar articles
-
Early oral feeding after colorectal resection: a randomized controlled study.ANZ J Surg. 2004 May;74(5):298-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.02985.x. ANZ J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15144242 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized controlled trial of postoperative nasogastric tube decompression in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery.Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Sep;88(3):399-402. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00183-4. Obstet Gynecol. 1996. PMID: 8752247 Clinical Trial.
-
Early oral feeding after elective colorectal surgery: is it safe.Trop Gastroenterol. 1995 Oct-Dec;16(4):72-3. Trop Gastroenterol. 1995. PMID: 8854962 Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective randomized trial of routine postoperative nasogastric decompression in patients with bowel anastomosis.Can J Surg. 1992 Dec;35(6):629-32. Can J Surg. 1992. PMID: 1458389 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized clinical trial evaluating the need for routine nasogastric decompression after elective hepatic resection.Br J Surg. 2007 Mar;94(3):297-303. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5728. Br J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17315273 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Nutrition Care in Cancer Surgery Patients: A Narrative Review of Nutritional Screening and Assessment Methods and Nutritional Considerations.Cureus. 2022 Dec 29;14(12):e33094. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33094. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36721576 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early Versus Delayed (Traditional) Postoperative Oral Feeding in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Anastomosis.Adv Biomed Res. 2018 Feb 16;7:30. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_290_16. eCollection 2018. Adv Biomed Res. 2018. PMID: 29531928 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes towards Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) interventions in colorectal surgery: nationwide survey of Australia and New Zealand colorectal surgeons.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Jun;407(4):1637-1646. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02488-7. Epub 2022 Mar 11. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022. PMID: 35275247 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-based surgical practice in academic medical centers: consistently anecdotal?J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 May;14(5):904-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1175-1. Epub 2010 Mar 6. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010. PMID: 20213210
-
Early oral feeding vs. traditional feeding in patients undergoing elective open bowel surgery-a randomized controlled trial.J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 May;18(5):1017-23. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2489-1. Epub 2014 Mar 14. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014. PMID: 24627256 Clinical Trial.