Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993;23(9):771-6.
doi: 10.1007/BF00311618.

The advantage of primary resection and anastomosis with intraoperative bowel irrigation for obstructing left-sided colorectal carcinoma

Affiliations

The advantage of primary resection and anastomosis with intraoperative bowel irrigation for obstructing left-sided colorectal carcinoma

H Mochizuki et al. Surg Today. 1993.

Abstract

Of a total 712 patients with left-sided colorectal cancer, 79 (11%) required emergency surgery due to severe obstruction by tumors. Of these 79 patients, 55 underwent tumor resection and anastomosis. Primary resection and anastomosis with intraoperative bowel irrigation was performed in 44 patients (primary group), while staged resection and anastomosis was performed in only 11 (staged group). In comparing the two groups, there was no significant difference in the rates of curative resection, being 76% versus 90%. However, the primary group demonstrated significantly lower rates of postoperative wound infection (P < 0.001), anastomotic dehiscence (P not equal to 0.05), and postoperative mortality, at 2% versus 18% (P < 0.05). The cumulative survival curve was also better in the primary group (P < 0.05). These favorable results of the primary group were confirmed by analyses which established that no bias of therapeutic backgrounds existed in either of the two groups. Thus, it was concluded that for left-sided obstructing colorectal carcinoma, intraoperative bowel irrigation, followed by primary resection and anastomosis, produces more advantageous results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Surg. 1977 Oct;64(10):741-4 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1980 Feb;67(2):80-1 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1974 Apr;127(4):492-9 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1974 Jan;61(1):16-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1957 Nov;45(191):270-4 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources