Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Oct 1;70(1):56-61.
doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(93)90131-5.

Heterogeneity in bladder cancer as detected by conventional chromosome analysis and interphase cytogenetics

Affiliations

Heterogeneity in bladder cancer as detected by conventional chromosome analysis and interphase cytogenetics

R Schapers et al. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. .

Abstract

Thirty transitional cell carcinomas (TCCs) of the bladder were examined by classical chromosome counting to establish range, modal number, and percentage of metaphases with 2n, 3n, 4n, and > or = 5n chromosomes. In addition, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was applied to interphase nuclei to detect the percentage of tumor cells showing polyploidization and chromosome imbalance. In FISH, centromere-specific DNA probes for chromosomes 1, 7, 9, and 11 were used. The tumors were analyzed flow cytometrically to determine the DNA index (DI). Fourteen of 21 cases (67%) having a DI = 1 showed, after classical chromosome counting, in addition to a diploid model number, some cells with a 3n and 4n chromosome count. With FISH, eight cases (38%) showed a low percentage of cells with multiple signals for each of the probes, thus indicating polyploidization. In 13 (62%) cases, an imbalance between different chromosomes was detected. In nine tumors having a DI of 1.6 to 1.9, classical chromosome counting showed low percentages of > or = 5n cells in four cases, in addition to a triploid modal number. With FISH in six cases, a low percentage of cells showed five or more signals for each of the chromosomes, indicating polyploidization. In all cases, a chromosome imbalance was detected. With classical chromosome counting not all tumors can be analyzed. With FISH, small percentages of polyploid cells are not recognized. Both methods complement each other in that chromosome counting allows readier detection of heterogeneity in DNA-diploid tumors after polyploidization, whereas FISH allows efficient recognition of the chromosomes involved in the process of imbalance.

PubMed Disclaimer