Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993;67(3):239-44.
doi: 10.1007/BF00864222.

Is energy substrate mobilization a limiting factor for cold thermogenesis?

Affiliations

Is energy substrate mobilization a limiting factor for cold thermogenesis?

A L Vallerand et al. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993.

Abstract

Energy substrate mobilization has been suggested as being a limiting factor for the rate of cold-induced thermogenesis (M), and consequently in delaying hypothermia. The evidence supporting this hypothesis in humans, however, is not convincing and the hypothesis has yet to be tested in a rigorous manner using a full heat balance analysis (partitional calorimetry). The goal of this study was therefore to re-investigate whether enhancing energy substrate mobilization by feeding cold-exposed subjects would improve M and affect heat debt (S; the minute-by-minute balance of M and heat losses) as well as rectal (Tre) and mean skin temperatures (Tsk). Nine healthy semi-nude fasted subjects were exposed to 5 degrees C (3 h at rest, 1 m.s-1 wind) on three occasions following the ingestion at min 0 and 90 of either: (1) a placebo, (2) 710 kJ of pure carbohydrates (100%-CHO), or (3) 710 kJ of a high-carbohydrate bar (High-CHO). As expected in the cold, Tre and Tsk decreased whereas M, S and heat losses increased (P < 0.01). However, there were no differences between treatments, including the final Tre [mean (SEM); 36.4 (0.2); 36.5 (0.3) and 36.5 (0.2) degrees C for the placebo, 100%-CHO and High-CHO tests, respectively]. During the 100%-CHO treatment, rates of carbohydrate oxidation were the highest and fat oxidation the lowest (P < 0.05), whereas the High-CHO treatment caused smaller changes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989 Jul;67(1):438-44 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;65(3):286-94 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1988 Nov;65(5):2046-50 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1991 May;70(5):1996-2002 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Aug;69(2):776-84 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources