This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Editorial

. 1993 Nov 1;22(5):1280-2.

doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90530-e.

Utility of a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device: to plug or not to plug?

P B Krause, L W Klein

PMID: 8227780
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90530-e

Free article

Editorial

Utility of a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device: to plug or not to plug?

P B Krause et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993.

Free article

. 1993 Nov 1;22(5):1280-2.

doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90530-e.

Authors

P B Krause, L W Klein

PMID: 8227780
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90530-e

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty.
Sanborn TA, Gibbs HH, Brinker JA, Knopf WD, Kosinski EJ, Roubin GS. Sanborn TA, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Nov 1;22(5):1273-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90529-a. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993. PMID: 8227779 Clinical Trial.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Substances

Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Elsevier Science
Other Literature Sources
- The Lens - Patent Citations Database
Medical
- ClinicalTrials.gov