Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer
- PMID: 8239247
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-12-199312150-00003
Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices.
Design: Prospective, observational study.
Setting: Comprehensive cancer center at a university hospital.
Participants: 1431 consecutive patients with cancer requiring 1630 venous access devices for long-term use inserted between 1 June 1987 and 31 May 1989.
Measurements: Quantitative microbiologic tests to identify device-related bacteremia and fungemia, catheter tunnel infection, pocket infection in implantable port devices, and site infections; number of days the device remained in situ and time until infectious morbidity; vessel or device thrombosis and device breakage.
Results: At least one device-related infection occurred with 341 of 788 (43% [95% CI, 39% to 47%]) catheters compared with 57 of 680 (8% [CI, 6% to 10%]) completely implanted ports (P < or = 0.001). Device-related bacteremia or fungemia is the predominant infection occurring with catheters, whereas ports have a more equal distribution of pocket, site, and device-related bacteremia. The predominant organisms isolated in catheter-related bacteremia were gram-negative bacilli (55%) compared with gram-positive cocci (65.5%) in port-related bacteremia. The number of infections per 1000 device days was 2.77 (95% CI, 2.48 to 3.06) for catheters compared with 0.21 (CI, 0.16 to 0.27) for ports (P < or = 0.001). Based on a parametric model of time to first infection, devices lasted longer in patients with solid tumors than in those with hematopoietic tumors. Ports lasted longer than catheters across all patient groups.
Conclusions: The incidence of infections per device-day was 12 times greater with catheters than with ports. Patients with solid tumors were the least likely to have device-related infectious morbidity compared with those with hematologic cancers. The reasons for the difference in infectious complications is uncertain but may be attributable to type of disease, intensity of therapy, frequency with which devices are accessed, or duration of neutropenia.
Comment in
-
Catheter-related bacteremias in patients with cancer.Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jul 1;121(1):72-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-1-199407010-00017. Ann Intern Med. 1994. PMID: 8043120 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jul;33(8):1190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00039-7. Eur J Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9301441 Clinical Trial.
-
Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.Ann Oncol. 1998 Jul;9(7):767-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1008392423469. Ann Oncol. 1998. PMID: 9739444
-
Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections.J Intraven Nurs. 2001 May-Jun;24(3):180-205. J Intraven Nurs. 2001. PMID: 11530364 Review.
-
Implantable venous port-related infections in cancer patients.Support Care Cancer. 2004 Mar;12(3):197-201. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0576-z. Epub 2004 Jan 16. Support Care Cancer. 2004. PMID: 14727170
-
Infection of totally implantable venous access devices: A review of the literature.J Vasc Access. 2018 May;19(3):230-242. doi: 10.1177/1129729818758999. Epub 2018 Mar 7. J Vasc Access. 2018. PMID: 29512430 Review.
Cited by
-
Vancomycin and ceftazidime bioactivities persist for at least 2 weeks in the lumen in ports: simplifying treatment of port-associated bloodstream infections by using the antibiotic lock technique.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 May;45(5):1565-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.5.1565-1567.2001. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001. PMID: 11302830 Free PMC article.
-
Removal of totally implanted venous access ports for suspected infection in the intensive care unit: a multicenter observational study.Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Mar 27;8(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0383-9. Ann Intensive Care. 2018. PMID: 29594891 Free PMC article.
-
1000 Port-A-Cath ® placements by subclavian vein approach: single surgeon experience.World J Surg. 2015 Feb;39(2):328-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2802-x. World J Surg. 2015. PMID: 25245435
-
Comparison of complications between transjugular and axillosubclavian approach for placement of tunneled, central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: a prospective study.Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun;15(6):1100-4. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2641-0. Epub 2005 Jan 28. Eur Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15678320
-
Immune-complex glomerulonephritis associated with Staphylococcus aureus infection of a totally implantable venous device.Support Care Cancer. 1995 Sep;3(5):324-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00335312. Support Care Cancer. 1995. PMID: 8520882
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources