Similar articles

• [Re-examination of diagnosis formulation, assessment of clinical diagnosis quality and pathology documentation].

  Shmurun RI. Shmurun RI. Arkh Patol. 1992;54(4):37-9. Arkh Patol. 1992. PMID: 1444856 Russian. No abstract available.
• Improved quality of patient care through routine second review of histopathology specimens prior to multidisciplinary meetings.

  Kuijpers CC, Burger G, Al-Janabi S, Willems SM, van Diest PJ, Jiwa M. Kuijpers CC, et al. J Clin Pathol. 2016 Oct;69(10):866-71. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203488. Epub 2016 Mar 30. J Clin Pathol. 2016. PMID: 27030307
• [Computer program for the analysis of clinical diagnostic errors based on a pathology database].

  Kazantseva IA, Kanareĭtseva TD, Svishchev AV, Bel'skaia OB. Kazantseva IA, et al. Arkh Patol. 1992;54(4):31-3. Arkh Patol. 1992. PMID: 1444853 Russian.
• [Diagnostic validity and variability of histopathology].

  Tezuka F. Tezuka F. Rinsho Byori. 1994 Sep;42(9):902-6. Rinsho Byori. 1994. PMID: 7967112 Review. Japanese.
• Errors and pitfalls in diagnostic cytology: new techniques applied to cytopathology.

  Ross JS. Ross JS. Monogr Pathol. 1997;(39):94-117. Monogr Pathol. 1997. PMID: 9249822 Review. No abstract available.