Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Nov 15;27(4):773-8.
doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90448-5.

High-dose preoperative radiation for cancer of the rectum: impact of radiation dose on patterns of failure and survival

Affiliations

High-dose preoperative radiation for cancer of the rectum: impact of radiation dose on patterns of failure and survival

N R Ahmad et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: A variety of dose-time schedules are currently used for preoperative radiation therapy of rectal cancer. An analysis of patients treated with high-dose preoperative radiation therapy was undertaken to determine the influence of radiation dose on the patterns of failure, survival, and complications.

Methods and materials: Two hundred seventy-five patients with localized rectal cancer were treated with high-dose preoperative radiation therapy. One hundred fifty-six patients received 45 Gy, +/- 10% (low-dose group). Since 1985, 119 patients with clinically unfavorable cancers (fixed, low-lying, or deeply ulcerated) were given a higher dose, 55 Gy, +/- 10%, using a shrinking field technique (high-dose group). All patients underwent curative resection. Median follow-up was 66 months in the low-dose group and 28 months in the high-dose group. Patterns of failure, survival, and complications were analyzed as a function of radiation dose.

Results: Fourteen percent (38/275) of the total group developed a local recurrence; 20% (31/156) in the low-dose group as compared with 6% (7/119) in the high-dose group. The actuarial local recurrence rate at 5 years was 20% for the low-dose group and 8% for the high-dose group, and approached statistical significance with p = .057. For tethered/fixed tumors the actuarial local recurrence rates at 5 years were 28% and 9%, respectively, with p = .05. Similarly, for low-lying tumors (less than 6 cm from the anorectal junction) the rates were 24% and 9%, respectively, with p = .04. The actuarial rate of distant metastasis was 28% in the low-dose group and 20% in the high-dose group and was not significantly different. Overall actuarial 5-year survival for the total group of patients was 66%. No significant difference in survival was observed between the two groups, despite the higher proportion of unfavorable cancers in the high-dose group. The incidence of complications was 2%, equally distributed between the two groups.

Conclusion: High-dose preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer results in excellent local control rates. However, in clinically unfavorable cancers a higher dose (55 Gy) of preoperative radiation can be given safely with significantly improved local control. Careful clinical staging is helpful in selectively treating patients with unfavorable tumors to a higher preoperative radiation dose and thus optimizing their outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources