Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Sep;8(3):170-4.
doi: 10.1007/BF00341193.

Level of anastomosis and anorectal manometry in predicting function following anterior resection for adenocarcinoma

Affiliations

Level of anastomosis and anorectal manometry in predicting function following anterior resection for adenocarcinoma

Y H Ho et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1993 Sep.

Abstract

The clinical and physiological consequences of sphincter preservation after resection of rectal carcinoma at various levels were evaluated. Thirty-two patients (mean age 59.2 years; range 31-79 years) who had undergone curative surgery at least one year previously and were not given adjuvant therapy, were studied with 19 normal controls. Three blinded observers independently assessed clinical sphincter function, level of anastomosis (ANL) and anorectal manometry. 85.7% had an increase in stool frequency but their normal lifestyles were unaffected. The mean stool frequency was 3.1 (range 2 to 8) times/day. The anal maximal basal and maximum squeeze pressures, rectal volume of first sensation (VIS) and urge, maximum tolerable volume and compliance were all significantly impaired (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer function had significantly lower ANLs (P < 0.05). On multiple regression analysis, the ANL and the VIS significantly predicted stool frequency (P < 0.05). ANL below 6 cm was significantly associated with impaired frequency of stools (P < 0.05). This may be a subgroup of patients whose residual rectal reservoir function is compromised and may theoretically benefit from colonic pouches.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Surg. 1989 Aug;76(8):783-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1983 Dec;70(12):727-9 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Apr;34(4):329-35 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1984 Jan;71(1):17-20 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1985 Aug;72(8):595-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources